2011
DOI: 10.7761/hce.2.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finite Universe: Discursive Double Bind and Parrhesia in State Socialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such systems, governance is based on the inconsistency of rules and the resulting self-censorship on part of the citizens. Communication is highly paradoxical and paralyzing, such as the frequent external requirement to ‘exercise self-criticism’ or common involvement in a ‘permanent revolution’ as salient examples of double bind discourse ( Erdős & Kelemen, 2011 ). Previous sociocultural traditions are changed ‘for once and all’, depriving the people of shared meanings and symbols.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such systems, governance is based on the inconsistency of rules and the resulting self-censorship on part of the citizens. Communication is highly paradoxical and paralyzing, such as the frequent external requirement to ‘exercise self-criticism’ or common involvement in a ‘permanent revolution’ as salient examples of double bind discourse ( Erdős & Kelemen, 2011 ). Previous sociocultural traditions are changed ‘for once and all’, depriving the people of shared meanings and symbols.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the society suffered from the destructive consequences of silenced stories, not being able to communicate about their past traumas, including the defeat of the 1956 Revolution and War of Independence that personally affected and traumatized most families in the country. Hungary’s ‘soft dictatorship’, beginning in the 1970s, heavily relied on techniques of manipulation instead of open aggression, with the predominance of vague (empty or floating) signifiers and paradoxical discursive resources that were largely unfit for identity reconstruction ( Erdős & Kelemen, 2011 ).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%