1999
DOI: 10.2307/2586501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The finite model property for various fragments of intuitionistic linear logic

Abstract: Recently Lafont [6] showed the finite model property for the multiplicative additive fragment of linear logic (MALL) and for affine logic (LLW), i.e., linear logic with weakening. In this paper, we shall prove the finite model property for intuitionistic versions of those, i.e. intuitionistic MALL (which we call IMALL), and intuitionistic LLW (which we call ILLW). In addition, we shall show the finite model property for contractive linear logic (LLC), i.e., linear logic with contraction. and for its intuitioni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results that we obtain in Section 5 include the cut-elimination property for several logical systems, the decidability of logics and of varieties of residuated structures, the finite model property, and the finite embeddability property. The homomorphism theorem generalizes and simplifies ideas found in a variety of papers [2][3][4]16,18,22,24,25] that address the above types of problems in otherwise seemingly unrelated ways. Thus the notion of residuated frame provides a unifying framework for the analysis of various logical and algebraic properties and for their proof in a general setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Results that we obtain in Section 5 include the cut-elimination property for several logical systems, the decidability of logics and of varieties of residuated structures, the finite model property, and the finite embeddability property. The homomorphism theorem generalizes and simplifies ideas found in a variety of papers [2][3][4]16,18,22,24,25] that address the above types of problems in otherwise seemingly unrelated ways. Thus the notion of residuated frame provides a unifying framework for the analysis of various logical and algebraic properties and for their proof in a general setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The sequent proof systems we mentioned in this paper have the sub-formula property, so that provability is decidable in each case, using a simple proof search algorithm [26]. Surprisingly, the concept of types can be used to cut off useless branches.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] defines phase spaces for CNL and employs them in proofs of some meta-logical theorems; phase spaces for InNL (denoted there by CNL − ) are defined, but not worked out. Phase spaces for associative substructural logics were studied in [9,1,15]. The present paper is mostly proof-theoretic (but we avoid proof nets).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%