2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-3435.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Financing of Education: An Economic Issue?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In academic debates regarding the most appropriate investment model in higher education, there exist both instrumentalist and utilitarian attitudes towards higher education, albeit reductionist regarding the understanding of social reality [11], [20], [6]. Arguments in favour of the application of one of the investment models are based on the expected or actual impact of higher education on social, economic and personal development, particularly in terms of the share of public and private investment in higher education.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academic debates regarding the most appropriate investment model in higher education, there exist both instrumentalist and utilitarian attitudes towards higher education, albeit reductionist regarding the understanding of social reality [11], [20], [6]. Arguments in favour of the application of one of the investment models are based on the expected or actual impact of higher education on social, economic and personal development, particularly in terms of the share of public and private investment in higher education.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall trends in public expenditure for education described here are not unique to the UK, as similar patterns are evident in France and Germany for example (see Carpentier, 2001b;Carry, 2000;Diebolt 1995;Fontvieille 1990;Michel, 1999). Shifting patterns and reductions in public expenditure are evident also in developing countries (Bourdon, 2002;Bouslimani, 2002;Eicher, 2000;Lange, 2001). Mingat and Tan (1998) outline differences in public investment for education and economic growth between «rich» and «poor» countries and within these countries reflecting different policy choices.…”
Section: Developments In Educational Expenditurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we examine current policy debates and developments in relation to funding mechanisms for education in practice. Following the differentiation between funding needs and modalities for post-compulsory education and compulsory education identified by some economists (see Barr, 2000;Eicher, 2000), we look in turn at each of these sectors of provision. In both these sectors, the constraints on public expenditure triggered by the 1973 economic crisis, alongside policy concerns for educational expansion have resulted in changes to funding mechanisms as part of wider reforms of compulsory and post-compulsory provision.…”
Section: Funding Mechanisms and Educational Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Custos, v. 15, n. 2, p. 28-53, mai./ago. 2020 Essas diferenças podem ser explicadas devido à localização geográfica da instituição de ensino, pois as instituições descentralizadas tendem a possuir uma estrutura de custos mais elevada (Høstmark-Tarrou, 1999), ou ainda, instituições com maior infraestrutura de apoio ao aluno possuem custo por aluno superior àquelas cuja infraestrutura de apoio é menor (Eicher, 2000).…”
unclassified