The Financialization of Housing in Capitalism’s Peripheries

Abstract

Financialization has become a new keyword to describe and analyze contemporary developments in economies and societies. It has also become a key concept in understanding recent trends in housing markets and policies. Since most scholarship that has initially studied these new trends was produced by scholars based in Europe, North America, and Australia and reflected on the dynamics of countries situated at the centers of the world economy, questions arose on the extent to which these trends could also be detected outside of these countries. The call for articles that originated this special issue was intended to collectively answer this question: Does the financialization of housing shape, and is it shaped by, housing policies and practices in countries situated at the peripheries of the global economy? The initial call for articles referred to these other territories and economies as the Global South. Although the term Global South is generally juxtaposed with the term Global North, which suggests a very strong binary, the idea was not to employ the term in this binary fashion. Rather, Global South was used as a shorthand or heuristic device to focus on countries other than Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, or those of Europe. We also could have opted for terms like nonrich, poor, non-Western, Third World, developing, or underdeveloped countries. The denominations born of postwar decolonization processes, which are founded on the discourse in which Truman launched the Point 4 Program, divided the world into advanced, modern, and developed countries on one hand, and traditional, backward, and underdeveloped countries on the other. Development aid was thought to enable everyone to reach, at some point, the desired stage of a developed country. In the 1960s, multilateral agencies and central universities adopted a new epithet in the same direction: developing countries. But like the term Global South, these are all problematic terms. They all have links to specific modes of organizing the globe that, throughout modern history, very often produced a dualistic view of the world. Most recently, denominations follow each other in quick succession and compete: South, Global South, emerging economies. Classification systems produce and reproduce a representation of the world and of the positions occupied by different individuals, social groups, and collective actors, but also by territories. South-North and Global South-Global North classifications are highly indebted to the tradition of geographic regionalization, which is based on homogeneities. In reality, there are more complex constellations of countries. We do not intend to resolve such issues in this special issue. Instead, we would like to focus on the financialization of housing in countries located at the peripheries of the world economy, with the specific goal of rejecting binary thinking about financialization processes. A common critique in the financialization literature is that the concept is used to suggest that the same process takes pla...

Variedades de financiarización de la vivienda en América Latina: un análisis comparado entre Chile y Venezuela (2000-2015)

“…En este contexto, la financiarización se ha convertido en una dimensión estratégica para comprender los cambios en la provisión de vivienda en el sur global (Aalbers et al, 2020), ya que estos serían cambios vinculados a las características que ha adoptado el capitalismo financiero en los distintos países y geografías del sur global (Fernández y Aalbers, 2020). Así, autores como Fernández y Aalbers (2020), en base a una propuesta anterior de Nölke, et al (2015), proponen una serie de tipologías para comprender esta relación.…”

“…la experiencia venezolana parece representar una diversidad de procesos de inversión inmobiliaria (Aalbers et al, 2020), tanto de capitales nacionales como internacionales, en un contexto de crisis y caída de la renta petrolera, soporte fundamental del desarrollo económico del país.…”

“…En el último tiempo ha proliferado un arduo debate respecto a la relación entre los procesos de financiarización de los países del norte global y sus periferias, así como también en torno a las diferencias entre las distintas geografías constitutivas del sur global (Fernández y Aalbers, 2020). Esto no solo ha posibilitado evidenciar las variedades de financiarización desplegadas en un sistema inmobiliario financiero de alcance global, sino también explorar, más allá de la díada norte/sur, las complejas relaciones de dominio o subordinación económica articuladas entre distintas geografías (Aalbers et al, 2020).…”

Advancing urban water security: The urbanization of water–society relations and entry–points for political engagement

“…Moreover, our approach acknowledges that cities are increasingly linked to the real estate sector and associated patterns of speculation and investment, where finance plays a central role in the contemporary production of space ( Fernandez & Aalbers, 2020;Fields, 2017;Weber, 2010). This matters greatly for urban water security, as the rise of financialized real estate reconfigures land values and ownership, as well as infrastructure provisioning and regulation-often in ways that reinforce existing urban inequalities and further impede access to housing and infrastructure among low-income groups (Aalbers et al, 2020;Wahby, 2019). These dynamics directly underpin the urban water insecurities that are documented by existing literature, yet which are typically framed in terms of problems to be solved by better technologies, policies, or institutional arrangements (e.g.…”

Financialization of housing in Southern Europe – the role of the state

“…More recently, increasing attention has been dedicated to financialization in the Global South as well (e.g. Aalbers et al, 2020). Manuel Aalbers (2019, p. 377), however, has recently argued that 'housing financialization, or any other form of financialization for that matter, is not primarily about showing which investigating housing trends in connection to welfare systems in Sweden and Greece.…”