1977
DOI: 10.1080/05775132.1977.11470296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Financial Instability Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Keynes and an Alternative to“Standard” Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
214
0
37

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
214
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…This financial accelerator effect may lead to both persistence and amplification of real economic shocks (see e.g. Bernanke and 9 The idea that credit booms are important for our understanding of financial crisis goes back to the seminal work of Minsky (1977) and Kindleberger (1978), who -through a comprehensive study of financial crises -documented regular trends in the relationship between credit and financial imbalances.…”
Section: House Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This financial accelerator effect may lead to both persistence and amplification of real economic shocks (see e.g. Bernanke and 9 The idea that credit booms are important for our understanding of financial crisis goes back to the seminal work of Minsky (1977) and Kindleberger (1978), who -through a comprehensive study of financial crises -documented regular trends in the relationship between credit and financial imbalances.…”
Section: House Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes growth of lending and, consequently, increased vulnerability to risk. Liquidity problems can cause a crisis of insolvency through a "domino effect" (Minsky, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is ironic as the one subject that the discipline of finance has ignored and forgotten, much to its own detriment, is its history of crashes, bubbles and bank failures (Reinhart & Rogoff, 2009). Minsky (1977) predicted in his Financial Instability theory, how markets tend to react with speculative euphoria leading to bubbles. While his theories had great insight, they were not taken seriously as they were not cast in mathematical models.…”
Section: Science Of Choices or Choices Of Science?mentioning
confidence: 99%