2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fibula Osteomyocutaneous Flap for Mandible Reconstruction: A 15-Year Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
68
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Donor site complications were similarly low, including a single radius fracture in each series (incidence 0.45% to 0.6%) (3,9). Notably, recipient site hardware exposure was 16% to 17%, a value that is higher than typically reported for the fibula flap (16,17), but consistently reported for the OC-RFFF (9,15). This complication occurred in one of the six patients (16.7%) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Donor site complications were similarly low, including a single radius fracture in each series (incidence 0.45% to 0.6%) (3,9). Notably, recipient site hardware exposure was 16% to 17%, a value that is higher than typically reported for the fibula flap (16,17), but consistently reported for the OC-RFFF (9,15). This complication occurred in one of the six patients (16.7%) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A total of 10 studies reported on the presence of claw toe and weakness in dorsiflexion of the great toe 7,23,26,28,45,50,53,56,60 (Table 13). Evaluation of claw toe and weakness in dorsiflexion of the great toe was accomplished by clinical examination.…”
Section: Claw Toe and Weakness In Dorsiflexion Of The Great Toementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many reports, mandibular segmental defects are managed with vascularized grafts from the iliac crest or the fibula to maximize blood supply following tumor removal. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Surgeons may prefer to harvest a nonvascular iliac graft if the size of the defect is smaller, the continuity of the mandible has not been interrupted, the nature of the tumor is nonmalignant, and/or radiation therapy was not necessary to control the tumor. [7][8][9] The degree of resorption of nonvascularized iliac bone grafts is an important consideration when treatment planning includes hard tissue reconstruction and dental implant restoration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%