1998
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.6281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FERET verification testing protocol for face recognition algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the face recognition literature, face orientation has received deliberate attention. The FERET data base [17], for instance, includes both frontal and oblique views, and several specialized data bases have been collected to try to develop methods of face recognition that are invariant to moderate change in face orientation [20]. In the face expression literature, use of multiple perspectives is rare and relatively less attention has been focused on the problem of pose invariance.…”
Section: Head Orientation and Scene Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the face recognition literature, face orientation has received deliberate attention. The FERET data base [17], for instance, includes both frontal and oblique views, and several specialized data bases have been collected to try to develop methods of face recognition that are invariant to moderate change in face orientation [20]. In the face expression literature, use of multiple perspectives is rare and relatively less attention has been focused on the problem of pose invariance.…”
Section: Head Orientation and Scene Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of comparative tests on common data, the relative strengths and weaknesses of different approaches is difficult to determine. In the areas of face and speech recognition, comparative tests have proven valuable [e.g., 17], and similar benefits would likely accrue in the study of facial expression analysis. A large, representative test-bed is needed with which to evaluate different approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same experimental protocol used in (Hajati, 2012) was applied in this work. The performance was measured in terms of rank-1 recognition accuracy and the Cumulative Matching Characteristics (CMC) (Rizvi, 1998). All the faces with the neutral expression were used for training, while the rest of database was used as the testing faces.…”
Section: Facial Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance is measured in terms of the Cumulative Match Characteristics (CMC) [9] and the rank-1 recognition rate. In order to demonstrate the performance improvement resulted from the fusion process, we also presented the final fusion result, as well as the result based on ridge (or valley) data only, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: B Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%