2022
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2022.2041475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fence ‘didn’t work’: the mundane engagements and material practices of state-led development in China’s Danjiangkou Reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A conventional, security‐ or state‐centred lens poorly reflects these dynamics: space needs to be made for documenting the multiple and contested hydropolitics evident in Chinese infrastructural investment and Chinese actors' roles in transboundary river governance. Within China, despite strong recentralising tendencies in recent years, we still understand the state to be fragmented, rife with conflict between different agencies, and with clear limits in its ability to establish and maintain political authority through its water projects (see for instance Lamb et al., 2022): China as a regional hydro‐hegemon is simply not very useful as a conceptual frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A conventional, security‐ or state‐centred lens poorly reflects these dynamics: space needs to be made for documenting the multiple and contested hydropolitics evident in Chinese infrastructural investment and Chinese actors' roles in transboundary river governance. Within China, despite strong recentralising tendencies in recent years, we still understand the state to be fragmented, rife with conflict between different agencies, and with clear limits in its ability to establish and maintain political authority through its water projects (see for instance Lamb et al., 2022): China as a regional hydro‐hegemon is simply not very useful as a conceptual frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%