1985
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390350056012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Femorofemoral Graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progression of disease in the donor iliac artery can lead to graft failure and a variety of incidences ranging from 1% to 15% have been reported in terms of the deterioration of the donor iliac artery. 8,12,[13][14][15][16] In the present study, 2 out of 99 cases (2%) required reintervention to improve the iliac inflow in order to maintain patency of a femorofemoral crossover bypass graft. The impaired distal perfusion in the donor limb is referred as a steal phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The progression of disease in the donor iliac artery can lead to graft failure and a variety of incidences ranging from 1% to 15% have been reported in terms of the deterioration of the donor iliac artery. 8,12,[13][14][15][16] In the present study, 2 out of 99 cases (2%) required reintervention to improve the iliac inflow in order to maintain patency of a femorofemoral crossover bypass graft. The impaired distal perfusion in the donor limb is referred as a steal phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…23 Although this approach clearly highlights the potential for recurrent iliac artery disease to compromise long-term graft patency rates, graft occlusion infrequently re.sults from progressive inflow disease in the absence of donor iliac artery PTA. Lamerton et al 13 reported that only one of 54 FFBs (2%) failed as a result of progressive donor iliac artery occlusive disease, 13 and in another report only one of 113 FFBs (1%) failed as a result of progressive inflow disease. 24 In a recent multicenter study, progressive donor iliac artery occlusive disease that required either PTA or surgical reconstruction developed in only 6% of 317 patients who underwent FFB, with a mean follow-up of 38 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our series, we had a superior result with good iliac artery inflow compared to the results of Lamerton and colleagues and Plecha and Plecha, in which progressive donor iliac artery inflow disease required either PTA or surgical reconstruction. 6,7 The infrainguinal bypass completes a fundamental role for lower extremity revascularization, especially to prevent limb amputation in diabetic patients with CLI. Although a proximal angioplasty is not generally enough in diabetic patients with CLI, the combination of a bypass procedure ensures a better distal perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%