Ruskin and Gender 2002
DOI: 10.1057/9780230522480_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feminist Origins of ‘Of Queens’ Gardens’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then Craig complains that I endorse through silence Ruskin's hierarchy of gender. Here, I am afraid, he is woefully ignorant of the excellent recent feminist work on Ruskin which long ago questioned Kate Millett's favoring of Ruskin over J. S. Mill (Peterson 2002;Birch 2002). Sesame and Lilies was well-received by the women's movement in Ruskin's own day and this is not surprising, as it closely reflected the feminist work of Anne Jameson whom Ruskin had met in Venice.…”
Section: Contemplation Production and Exchangementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then Craig complains that I endorse through silence Ruskin's hierarchy of gender. Here, I am afraid, he is woefully ignorant of the excellent recent feminist work on Ruskin which long ago questioned Kate Millett's favoring of Ruskin over J. S. Mill (Peterson 2002;Birch 2002). Sesame and Lilies was well-received by the women's movement in Ruskin's own day and this is not surprising, as it closely reflected the feminist work of Anne Jameson whom Ruskin had met in Venice.…”
Section: Contemplation Production and Exchangementioning
confidence: 96%