2013
DOI: 10.3386/w19131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Female Labor Force and Long-run Development: The American Experience in Comparative Perspective

Abstract: This paper provides additional evidence on the U-shaped relationship between the process of economic development and women's labor force participation. The experience of the United States is studied in a comparative perspective relative to a sample of rich economies observed over the period 1890-2005. The analysis confirms the existence of a U-shaped female labor supply function, coming from both crosscountry and within country variation. Further analysis of a large cross section of economies observed over the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
1
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
54
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Goldin found initial evidence of the U-shape relation in a study on the US (Goldin, 1995). These results were confirmed in more recent studies (Goldin, 2004, 2006, Olivetti, 2013) that were also able to pinpoint five distinct phases characterizing the evolution of FPRs in the US. The first phase ("The independent female worker", up to the 1920s) saw the entrance of young and low educated women into the labor force, mostly in poorly paid or non-paid occupations followed by a subsequent exit from the labor force explained by marriage and the shift to home work.…”
Section: Theory and Evidencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Goldin found initial evidence of the U-shape relation in a study on the US (Goldin, 1995). These results were confirmed in more recent studies (Goldin, 2004, 2006, Olivetti, 2013) that were also able to pinpoint five distinct phases characterizing the evolution of FPRs in the US. The first phase ("The independent female worker", up to the 1920s) saw the entrance of young and low educated women into the labor force, mostly in poorly paid or non-paid occupations followed by a subsequent exit from the labor force explained by marriage and the shift to home work.…”
Section: Theory and Evidencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Olivetti (2012) provides evidence from a large sample of developed and developing countries that connects the u-shaped profile for female labor force participation to structural transformation, extending the earlier work by Goldin (1995). Specifically, she finds that as countries develop, the share of women who work in agriculture relative to all working women decreases faster than the share of men who work in agriculture relative to all working men, the share of women who work in services increases faster than the share of men, and the share of women who work in manufacturing remains flatter than the share of men.…”
Section: Structural Transformation and Hours Workedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 During the early 20th century, the Danish female labor force participation rate was between 30 and 40 percent (Olivetti, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%