Fundamentally, space is a social product. Social practices both create and are supported by the built environment. Urbanity is so much more than a dense array of buildings; it is the street, the sidewalks, the alleys, the parks, the people--from the houseless to the penthoused. A city is best understood through the mechanisms that produce the social capital, identity, and space of those people who occupy it. The city of New Orleans is no exception. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina displaced hundreds of thousands of residents, deeply impacting the social economy of the city. This research explicates three unique social practices in New Orleans in a case study format. Each case study situates itself in an established urban theory that describes an urban condition in social terms. The theorists applied in each study respectively are Jane Jacobs, Richard Florida, and Henri Lefebvre. Often, the city is rationalized as an immutable object that is navigated. The purpose of this thesis is to render urban spaces in New Orleans (the street, the neighborhood, and the land) as the product of social practices and the built environment, each mutually producing and defining one another.
ConclusionComposite Drawing Bibliography SOCIAL NEW ORLEANS: IDENTITY, CAPITAL, SPACE work of Henri Lefebvre, with the hope of gleaning insight and perspective on a conflict that arose in the Algiers section of New Orleans very soon after Katrina. Broadly, this section engages the nature of communication and its influence on social practices and urban interventions. Communication is central to the production of Space. Space is not an object but a dynamic construction of layered dialogue. Henri Lefebvre argues that space is political by explicating space as the conflated product of social practices, facts, race, gender, etc. Here we examine the construction of Space through communication, more specifically, the communication of FEMA, the city government of New Orleans, a neighborhood named Lakewood Estates, and those individuals who were displaced by Hurricane Katrina, that constructed the Space associated with the section of land identified by FEMA as a temporary housing trailer site. Inextricably related to the communication of respective entities is their social capital and their mechanisms of social capital production which are closely related to class, race, gender, education, etc. To understand the construction of this Space via communication, we must identify the stakeholders' methods of communication and their motives as they relate to each other and to the land itself. This section explores stakeholders' methods of communication and argues that the technocratic and rational communication methods of FEMA acted as a common communication method among stakeholders which resulted in a conversation rooted in emotion and irrational, made opaque by a mask of rationale. The Lefebvrian idea of the Everyday, specifically the notion of a common denominator, provides a lens to understand the incongruities of stakeholder communication. The purpose of this s...