2015 23rd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/med.2015.7158797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feedback linearisation method for Embedded Model Control: The Borea project case-study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained value is reported in Table I. The next step was the identification of the function g(•) in (2). To this aim, a polynomial form was assumed for this function.…”
Section: A Static Nonlinearity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained value is reported in Table I. The next step was the identification of the function g(•) in (2). To this aim, a polynomial form was assumed for this function.…”
Section: A Static Nonlinearity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of c p0 and c p1 are reported in Table IV. In order to achieve an input-ouput relation is sufficient to make the time derivative of (14) without considering the model error e p (•) and substitute the actuator dynamics in (2),…”
Section: A Emc Control Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this chapter, it is presented two of them, the computed-torque and the Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI). The computed-torque and feedback linearisation has already been applied to quadrotors control (LOTUFO et al, 2015;BALASUBRAMANIAN;VASANTHARAJ, 2013), tri-rotors control (MOHAMED; LANZON, 2013) and fixed-wing control (CHEN; HE; QIAN, HU et al, 2012), but only preliminary results without convergence were applied to a tailsitter attitude controller (KOHNO; UCHIYAMA, 2014) and for the control of the flight velocity and path angle, which are more related to the navigation of a tailsitter (JUNG; SHIM, 2012). INDI was also used for the control of fixed-wing (SIEBERLING; CHU; MULDER, 2010), a quadrotor (SMEUR; CHU; CROON, 2015) and a tiltrotor (FRANCESCO; MATTEI, 2015), but not for tailsitters, reinforcing the contribution of the DI with PID structure for AVALON.…”
Section: Chapter Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%