1965
DOI: 10.1017/s000335610002225x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feed intake of milk cows I. Intake of winter rations during pregnancy and lactation and the influence of change to pasture

Abstract: SUMMARY1. For 4 weeks before calving in December or January a group of 7 Ayrshire cows each received daily 6 lb. hay and silage to appetite, whilst a second group of 9 received the same roughages and 6–10 lb. concentrates. After calving, cows from both of the pre-calving treatments were placed in each of two post-calving groups of 8 cows. A High treatment received approximately 8 lb./day more concentrates at the same milk yield than the Low treatment. Both groups continued to receive 6 lb. hay/cow/day and sila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty of getting representative samples for fat analyses may be the main explanation of the slightly lower correlations between intake and energy yield, compared to milk yield. This was also noted with cows by Holmes et al (1965).…”
Section: Milk Compositionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The difficulty of getting representative samples for fat analyses may be the main explanation of the slightly lower correlations between intake and energy yield, compared to milk yield. This was also noted with cows by Holmes et al (1965).…”
Section: Milk Compositionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The regression equations and correlation coefficients relating faecal output and DOM intake to animal production followed trends similar to those reported by Holmes et al, 1965, although milk yield, weight and weight gain accounted for a lower proportion of the total variance. This is possibly because in this experiment, with 16 cows and limited assistance available, Cr 2 O 3 was administered in suspension in oil and not as Cr 2 O 3 paper (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These factors include measurements which reflect energy expenditure such as milk yield, live weight and live-weight gain (e.g. Wallace, 1956;Holmes, Jones, Drake-Brockman and White, 1965), together with assessments of feed quality such as hay/concentrate ratios or digestibility (Conrad, Pratt and Hibbs, 1964) or weights of concentrates offered (Davenport, 1964;Johnson, Trimberger, Wright, Van Vleck and Henderson, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%