2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feasibility of vibration as a tool to assess spinal integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applied forces of this magnitude, combined with the need to apply these forces in multiple locations if regional mapping is desired, may cause viscoelastic responses and subsequent observer-effects. In comparison, the forces and total testing times associated with the SIMO technique described here appear to have little viscoelastic impact; FRF data are highly reproducible even in the presence of vibration that could be imagined as exacerbating (Kawchuk et al, 2008).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Applied forces of this magnitude, combined with the need to apply these forces in multiple locations if regional mapping is desired, may cause viscoelastic responses and subsequent observer-effects. In comparison, the forces and total testing times associated with the SIMO technique described here appear to have little viscoelastic impact; FRF data are highly reproducible even in the presence of vibration that could be imagined as exacerbating (Kawchuk et al, 2008).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previously, modal parameters succesfully revealed artificially induced structural alterations in human, goat and pig spinal segments (Kasra et al, 1992;Kawchuk et al, 2008Kawchuk et al, , 2009Van Engelen et al, 2011). However, the question remained whether modal parameters can also be obtained succesfully in human spines with mechanical changes due to physiological processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration testing has also been used to study structural disruption of the spine. Kasra et al (1992) found that removal of posterior elements slightly decreased the eigenfrequency, although not significantly, and Kawchuk et al (2008) found significant changes in the FRF data before and after successive disc transection and mounting of spinal instrumentation. Van Engelen et al (2011) showed that the eigenfrequencies of goat spinal motion segments for flexion-extension, lateroflexion and axial rotation can be determined by modal testing, and that it is possible to relate specific structural alterations (annulus puncture) to specific changes of the modal parameters (lower eigenfrequency for axial rotation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kawchuk et al . used a structural vibration test to assess the structural integrity of cadaveric porcine spines. In their equipment, an electromechanical shaker produced some short‐duration vibrations (frequency range up to 2000 Hz) and the response signals were acquired from five tri‐axial accelerometers fixed to the spinous processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%