“…The registry has collected data of more than 1000 patients, approximately 50% from published cohort studies, and 50% of unpublished data. 7,8,10,11,[17][18][19] In the registry, 25•3% of patients in a W&W approach developed a local regrowth in the first two years of follow-up. This local regrowth rate is considerably higher than the pooled 2-year local regrowth rate of 15•7% reported in the meta-analyis of Dossa et al This is probably explained by the strict inclusion criteria in the studies of the meta-analysis, whereas the registry is more based on an ' all-comers' strategy without narrow selection criteria.…”