2017
DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2017.0561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility of Online Assessment of Students’ Inductive Reasoning Skills Abilities in Namibia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proved that technology-based assessment is feasible and reliable in Namibia, even though some of the schools where the participants were from do not have adequate ICT facilities. The results of the studies conform to the current research communities that support the proposition that inductive reasoning develops during a broad age range and that the developmental process covers the whole period of elementary and secondary education (Csapó and Funke 2017;Kambeyo and Csapó 2017). Furthermore, this result indicates that research participants may not have explicit inductive reasoning training in this age-range at school, which suggests that the education curriculum may need to look into this aspect of reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This proved that technology-based assessment is feasible and reliable in Namibia, even though some of the schools where the participants were from do not have adequate ICT facilities. The results of the studies conform to the current research communities that support the proposition that inductive reasoning develops during a broad age range and that the developmental process covers the whole period of elementary and secondary education (Csapó and Funke 2017;Kambeyo and Csapó 2017). Furthermore, this result indicates that research participants may not have explicit inductive reasoning training in this age-range at school, which suggests that the education curriculum may need to look into this aspect of reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%