The Feasibility of Laryngoscope-Guided Tracheal Intubation in Microgravity During Parabolic Flight: A Comparison of Two Techniques

Abstract

We determined the feasibility of laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (LG-TI) in microgravity obtained during parabolic flight and tested the hypothesis that LG-TI is similarly successful in the free-floating condition, with the patient's head gripped between the anesthesiologist's knees, as in the restrained condition, with the torso strapped to the surface. Three personnel with no experience in airway management or microgravity participated in the study. LG-TI of a sophisticated full-size manikin was attempted on seven occasions in each condition by each investigator after ground-based training. The parabolic flights, which took place in an Airbus 300 over the Atlantic Ocean, provided 23 s of microgravity. During this time, the investigator opened a box with airway equipment, performed LG-TI, and attached and held onto a self-inflating bag. The efficacy of ventilation was assessed during level flight by squeezing the bag and noting whether the manikin sensors indicated a tidal volume > or =300 mL. There were no differences in ventilation success (41% versus 33%) or time to successful insertion (both 18 s) between the free-floating and the restrained conditions. More than 90% of failures were caused by the inability to insert the tracheal tube within 23 s. There were no differences in performance among investigators. We conclude that LG-TI is feasible in microgravity obtained during parabolic flight, but the success rate is infrequent because of severe time restrictions. There were no differences in success rate between the free-floating condition, with the head gripped between the knees, and the restrained condition, with the torso strapped to the surface.

Reduced-gravity Environment Hardware Demonstrations of a Prototype Miniaturized Flow Cytometer and Companion Microfluidic Mixing Technology

“…Emergency medical care Tracheal intubation (laryngoscope-guided, on manikin) 21 , cardiac life support (anesthetized pigs) 22 …”

“…Newcomers to reduced gravity testing may also look to parabolic flight demonstrations unrelated to in vitro diagnostics when attempting to make device evaluation possible (or figuring out what is possible). Demonstrations from other previous medical or biological experimentation with well-documented flight preparation, in-flight strategies, and flight test equipment are included in Table 1 15, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . These may be informative due to inclusion of manual in-flight tasks, use of specialized equipment, and experimental containment.…”

The anaesthetic management of microgravity-exposed individuals

“…Low Earth orbit causes trip signal delays of 540-700 ms, while on Mars, this can be anything between 6.5 and 44 minutes. 18 Preoperative computed tomography scans and smart systems that can create a surgical plan based on anatomical variations may negate the necessity for realtime intervention. In the future, indwelling nano-robots could enter the abdominal cavity through a small incision.…”

“…Various ingestible, self-assembling robots controlled by external magnets are already being investigated by engineers at the University of Nebraska. 18 Computer-assisted design and manufacturing and the use of three-dimensional printers could also provide on-board prostheses and equipment as needed, without the need to sacrifice precious payload capacity.…”

Mechanical ventilation and resuscitation under water: Exploring one of the last undiscovered environments – A pilot study

“…Airway management during microgravity simulation for space simulation has been evaluated in studies 7,8 as well as techniques for resuscitation in hypogravity have been developed and scientifically investigated. 9,10 However, there is one untouched field until now: the underwater environment.…”