2021
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility and Reliability of a Digits-in-Noise Test in the Clinical Follow-Up of Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that children (both NH and CI users) achieved a higher Hebrew DIN SRTn than adults is supported by previous studies showing that children struggle more than adults in noisy environments and require more favorable SNRs to perform as well as adults [ 19 , 20 ]. Also, the finding that CI users required a higher mean Hebrew DIN SRTn than NH individuals is supported by previous studies [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Nevertheless, in more difficult tests, such as sentences in noise (HeBio), the difference in SRTn between CI adult users and their NH peers was much larger (mean of 13–14 dB as opposed to 3–5 dB in the DIN test).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that children (both NH and CI users) achieved a higher Hebrew DIN SRTn than adults is supported by previous studies showing that children struggle more than adults in noisy environments and require more favorable SNRs to perform as well as adults [ 19 , 20 ]. Also, the finding that CI users required a higher mean Hebrew DIN SRTn than NH individuals is supported by previous studies [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Nevertheless, in more difficult tests, such as sentences in noise (HeBio), the difference in SRTn between CI adult users and their NH peers was much larger (mean of 13–14 dB as opposed to 3–5 dB in the DIN test).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The results of the DIN test have been examined in various languages and populations of CI users and were shown to correlate with the outcomes of other speech perceptions in noise tests [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. However, it is unclear whether the DIN test, primarily designed as a screening tool, can be sensitive enough to distinguish between different age groups and detect the onset of deafness, making it suitable for inclusion in the speech perception battery for follow-up in CI centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although China does not have a regular program for evaluating children’s hearing, a suitable hearing test is urgently needed to screen children. Previous studies have extended the use of some hearing tests originally designed for adults to children, such as the DIN test (Denys et al 2018; Koopmans et al 2018; Vroegop et al 2021; Wolmarans et al 2021). Alternatively, other studies have developed new tests for hearing screening in children, utilizing ecological sounds (e.g., sounds of dogs, cats, birds, piano, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%