2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-019-00562-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (Fe)male Robot: How Robot Body Shape Impacts First Impressions and Trust Towards Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive trust is measured by assessing the robot's performance and affective trust by assessing a robot's motives. Prominent factors that influence cognitive trust in a robot are its task performance and characteristics (Hancock et al, 2011;Bernotat et al, 2019), the timing and magnitude of errors (Rossi et al, 2017a;Rossi et al, 2017b) and even physical appearance such as a genderspecific body shape (Bernotat et al, 2019). In contrast to this however stands the "uncanny valley" phenomenon: when a robot exhibits aesthetic characteristics too similar to a human, this can negatively impact trust.…”
Section: Trust and The Investment Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive trust is measured by assessing the robot's performance and affective trust by assessing a robot's motives. Prominent factors that influence cognitive trust in a robot are its task performance and characteristics (Hancock et al, 2011;Bernotat et al, 2019), the timing and magnitude of errors (Rossi et al, 2017a;Rossi et al, 2017b) and even physical appearance such as a genderspecific body shape (Bernotat et al, 2019). In contrast to this however stands the "uncanny valley" phenomenon: when a robot exhibits aesthetic characteristics too similar to a human, this can negatively impact trust.…”
Section: Trust and The Investment Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a robot's design can prime the user to adopt a certain level of trust in it, the design's efficacy is often dependent on the context [39] and individual differences among human users [40,41]. As such, design alone may not be sufficient to induce the appropriate level of trust.…”
Section: Gaining Maintaining and Calibrating Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas human-human trust has been extensively studied, humanrobot trust poses new and complex research challenges. Prominent factors that influence trust in a robot are robot performance and characteristics [6,23], and the timing and magnitude of robot errors [42,43]. When it comes to trust, the prediction and predictability of behaviour are fundamental [52].…”
Section: Trust and The Investment Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we use the Godspeed questionnaire [3] except for the Perceived Safety category since the participant did not have to physically interact with the robots and kept their distance throughout the experiment. The post-study questionnaire also asks the participant to rate the trustworthiness [6] and performance of each robot and choose which robot they preferred as an assistant, as well as provide feedback about shortcomings, immersion, and their overall experience during the experiment.…”
Section: Protocol and Game Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%