1995
DOI: 10.1080/00364827.1995.10413574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) at the Faroe Islands, northeastern Atlantic

Abstract: At least 242 epi-and infauna species were found, of which 115 are reported as sponge associates for the first time in the North Atlantic. Sixty species, 19 genera and 1 family are recorded for the first time from the Faroes. Two hundred and twenty-five taxa were found as epifauna on the sponges, three taxa occurred as infauna and 14 taxa both as epi-and infauna.The morphology of the sponges influences the occurrence and composition of the represented fauna. Thus, the largest number of taxa were present on spon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
132
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
132
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In deeper areas in the Barents Sea, with relative warm, saline waters, the large-bodied Geodia barretti and G. macandrewii are forming dense populations referred to as ''sponge ground''. The fauna associated with sponge grounds is estimated to be at least twice as rich as that of the surrounding gravel or soft bottoms (Bett and Rice 1992;Klitgaard 1995) and sponge grounds may therefore have functions similar to those of coral reefs. Fish species such as Sebastes spp.…”
Section: Spatial Variation In Fish and Benthos Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deeper areas in the Barents Sea, with relative warm, saline waters, the large-bodied Geodia barretti and G. macandrewii are forming dense populations referred to as ''sponge ground''. The fauna associated with sponge grounds is estimated to be at least twice as rich as that of the surrounding gravel or soft bottoms (Bett and Rice 1992;Klitgaard 1995) and sponge grounds may therefore have functions similar to those of coral reefs. Fish species such as Sebastes spp.…”
Section: Spatial Variation In Fish and Benthos Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although application of spatial metrics in deeper marine ecosystems had been limited owing to difficulties associated with underwater mapping, it was successful in explaining fine-scale (<1 m) benthic species assemblages in the Antarctic (Teixidó et al 2002, Teixidó et al 2007). In deeper sites, the landscape is often characterized by sediment type, and not by vegetation or biogenic structures (with the exception of cold-water corals, carbonate mounds and sponge aggregations (Klitgaard 1995, Howell et al 2011, resulting in more subtle changes in seafloor structure which makes it inherently difficult to delineate benthic habitats (Zajac 2008). However, recent studies in automated seabed classification based on sidescan or multibeam sonar backscatter have greatly facilitated the creation of high resolution sediment interpretation maps (Wilson et al 2007, Lucieer 2008, Brown et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the presence of potentially toxic allelochemicals in many sponges (Bakus et al 1986, Kubanek et al 2002, there is usually a diverse community of invertebrates living in association with sponges (see Klitgaard 1995, Ribeiro et al 2003, and references therein). Some of these animals attach to the surface of the sponges, but many more are found living inside the canals and spaces within the sponge and can be thought of as endofauna (Saffo 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these animals attach to the surface of the sponges, but many more are found living inside the canals and spaces within the sponge and can be thought of as endofauna (Saffo 1992). Previous studies have related the composition of this endofaunal community to the availability of space within the sponge (Pearse 1950, Villamizar & Laughlin 1991, variation in the morphology of the sponge (Koukouras et al 1992, Klitgaard 1995 and local environmental conditions such as depth and habitat of collection (Pearse 1950, Peattie & Hoare 1981, Westinga & Hoetjes 1981, Ribeiro et al 2003. The potential effects of the chemical composition of different sponges on their endofaunal community have also been noted (Villamizar & Laughlin 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%