2021
DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.6716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fate of the Gallbladder in Patients Admitted to Bariatric Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore possible sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were preformed, even though they did not account for all heterogeneity. The impact of distinct exclusion criteria, mainly in objectives i and ii (risk of de novo post-bariatric GD and its predictive factors), might be an explanation-some authors 18,32,58 excluded patients with preoperative positive findings for GD in ultrasonography, while others 20,23,29 did not, leading to a possible overestimation of GD development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To explore possible sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were preformed, even though they did not account for all heterogeneity. The impact of distinct exclusion criteria, mainly in objectives i and ii (risk of de novo post-bariatric GD and its predictive factors), might be an explanation-some authors 18,32,58 excluded patients with preoperative positive findings for GD in ultrasonography, while others 20,23,29 did not, leading to a possible overestimation of GD development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven did not answer, and their studies were excluded from objectives i and ii. In total, 50 articles were included-39 for answering objectives i and ii (assessment of the risk of de novo symptomatic or asymptomatic GD and its predictive factors) 5,7,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]48,49,51,52,55,56,58,62 and 14 for objective iii (comparing BS alone versus BS + prophylactic CCY). 16,25,38,47,[50][51][52][53][54][59]…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research examined two surgical procedures, RYGB and SG, and defined RYGB as exposure and SG as nonexposure. A total of 10 articles [ 16 20 , 23 , 25 , 30 32 ] investigated whether the surgical procedure is a risk factor for cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery. There was moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 66%, P = 0.002), so a random-effect model was used for the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%