2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fate of biological soil crusts after fire: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies in temperate sandy habitats, fire quickly reduced soil lichen cover by 50% within a year in 50-year-old abandoned fields (Johansson & Reich, 2005) and by 90% within two years in prairies (Schulten, 1985). These reductions are at least as large as the 50% average reduction in postfire biocrust cover reported in a global meta-analysis (Brianne et al, 2020). Lichen diversity recovered within 10 years after fire in heathland in Scotland (Davies & Legg, 2008), indicating that biocrust in our study could potentially still be recovering seven years after fire.…”
Section: Fire Effectsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In previous studies in temperate sandy habitats, fire quickly reduced soil lichen cover by 50% within a year in 50-year-old abandoned fields (Johansson & Reich, 2005) and by 90% within two years in prairies (Schulten, 1985). These reductions are at least as large as the 50% average reduction in postfire biocrust cover reported in a global meta-analysis (Brianne et al, 2020). Lichen diversity recovered within 10 years after fire in heathland in Scotland (Davies & Legg, 2008), indicating that biocrust in our study could potentially still be recovering seven years after fire.…”
Section: Fire Effectsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, at the landscape scale, biocrust nutrient cycling in these systems may be on par with, or even exceed, vascular plants. Furthermore, our results suggest that the dynamics of biocrust abundance in these environments-largely driven by climate, wildfire, woody plant encroachment and physical disturbances such as livestock grazing and animal diggings (Concostrina-Zubiri et al, 2017;Eldridge et al, 2015;Ferrenberg et al, 2015;Mallen-Cooper et al, 2019;Palmer et al, 2020)-has important ecosystem-level implications for nutrient cycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Studies on the effects of fire on biocrusts could benefit from the inclusion of disturbance history and plant community identity, as the composition of biocrusts differs amongst plant communities (Condon & Pyke, 2020c). Although it has been asserted that biocrusts are highly susceptible to wildfire in a recent meta-analysis (Palmer et al, 2020), the current study (where fire is the sole disturbance, albeit some inferred disturbance by small rodents) and those cited here examining compound disturbances with fire, suggest that disturbances that are compounding with fire have a greater effect on cover of morphogroups compared with fire alone. The study presented here demonstrates the complex nature of this topic, necessitating more research.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%