2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fast Radio Burst Luminosity Function and Death Line in the Low-twist Magnetar Model

Abstract: We explore the burst energy distribution of fast radio bursts (FRBs) in the low-twist magnetar model of Wadiasingh & Timokhin (2019). Motivated by the power-law fluence distributions of FRB 121102, we propose an elementary model for the FRB luminosity function of individual repeaters with an inversion protocol which directly relates the power-law distribution index of magnetar short burst fluences to that for FRBs. The protocol indicates the FRB energy scales virtually linearly with crust/field dislocation amp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flat nature of the parameter space seen in our Monte Carlo simulation indicates the range of values allowed is far wider than our choice of model input. This result is in contrast with results from Wadiasingh et al (2020), who argued for a narrow energy band, but it is in line with with the recent detections of FRBlike bursts originating from the magnetar SGR 1935+2154 that span many orders of magnitude (see e.g. The CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al 2020;Kirsten et al 2020).…”
Section: Best Valuessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The flat nature of the parameter space seen in our Monte Carlo simulation indicates the range of values allowed is far wider than our choice of model input. This result is in contrast with results from Wadiasingh et al (2020), who argued for a narrow energy band, but it is in line with with the recent detections of FRBlike bursts originating from the magnetar SGR 1935+2154 that span many orders of magnitude (see e.g. The CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al 2020;Kirsten et al 2020).…”
Section: Best Valuessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…An alternative possibility is that the repetition rate increases significantly with the periodicity (Wadiasingh et al 2020). In this case, the periodicity of 180916 (and its high activity relative to SGR 1935+2154) may be ascribed to an extremely long period magnetar (Beniamini et al 2020).…”
Section: Rates: a Single Magnetar Population?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the low-twist models (Wadiasingh & Timokhin 2019;Wadiasingh et al 2020), magnetic field dislocations and oscillations in the NS surface can lead to pair cascades, assuming that the background charge density is sufficiently Figure 5. Two-component magnetar population consisting of (i) ordinary magnetars fixed to properties of SGR 1935+2154and extrapolated as a function of the luminosity function slope γ and (ii) a magnetar population whose activity rate (parameterized via the internal magnetic field) and birth rate (a fraction f CCSN of the CCSN rate) are allowed to vary (the value of γ is identical to both populations).…”
Section: Low-twist Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximate estimates for the pulsar death line are shown by dashed and dot-dashed lines (respectively cases I' and III' from (Zhang et al 2000)). Finally, the 'death line' for FRB creation in the low twist model (Wadiasingh et al 2020) (hereafter W20) is depicted by a dotted line. Allowed sources lie above the line.…”
Section: Proof Of Concept: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%