2021
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1877063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fantasy of carbon offsetting

Abstract: Carbon offsetting has been beset by problems and failures, and relies on the mobilisation of supportive discourses and knowledge-claims to retain a sense of credibility. Psycho-analytical ideology critique can help explain how these processes interact with questions of subjectivity. Analysis of interviews with carbon offset market practitioners suggests that identification with carbon offsetting is only partial, and that it is sustained through disavowal, through trust in the authority of the Other, and throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If any agri-food applications of microalgae were formally recognized as offset options, this could provide a mechanism for those delivering these applications to earn income from these markets. While the theory that offsetting is mutually beneficial has sometimes proven problematic in practice (Watt, 2021), efforts to foster sound offsetting practice continue (Allen et al, 2020). Notwithstanding such competing perspectives, one critical reality is that the agri-food uses of microalgae flagged as possible CC mitigation options could, it seems, also foster climate resilience based on the available evidence (Table 7).…”
Section: Agri-food Applications Of Microalgae and CC Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any agri-food applications of microalgae were formally recognized as offset options, this could provide a mechanism for those delivering these applications to earn income from these markets. While the theory that offsetting is mutually beneficial has sometimes proven problematic in practice (Watt, 2021), efforts to foster sound offsetting practice continue (Allen et al, 2020). Notwithstanding such competing perspectives, one critical reality is that the agri-food uses of microalgae flagged as possible CC mitigation options could, it seems, also foster climate resilience based on the available evidence (Table 7).…”
Section: Agri-food Applications Of Microalgae and CC Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local communities in the developing world can be negatively affected by the introduction of carbon offset-based forest management (Brockington and Ponte, 2015). Watt (2021) offers a stinging rebuke of offsets, arguing that they are ideological fantasies which offer only “illusory promises” that serve only to “absolve the subject of their carbon ‘sins’” with no real sense of climate justice (p. 15). In the end, offsets remain ecologically and morally questionable, especially in comparison to not having emissions to offset in the first place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. See this brief list of philosophical treatments (or analyses with philosophical considerations included): (Aldred, 2012;Caney, 2010;Goodin, 1994;Page, 2011Page, , 2013Watt, 2021).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon offsetting remains contentious within, at least, philosophy (Aldred, 2012;Caney, 2010;Goodin, 1994;Page, 2011Page, , 2013Watt, 2021). 1 By posing and then answering a general question about an aspect of the morality of carbon offsetting-Does carbon offsetting make luxury emissions morally permissible?-this essay helps to lessen some of the topic's contentiousness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%