2013
DOI: 10.1002/zoos.201300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fanniidae and Muscidae (Diptera) described by Paul Stein (1852-1921)

Abstract: An overview is given of the species‐group names in the families Fanniidae and Muscidae described by Paul Stein (1852–1921) together with their type specimens. Stein described 57 new species in the Fanniidae and 783 species in the Muscidae together with 5 replacement names, to which are added 6 unavailable species names (nomina nuda) in Fanniidae and 26 in Muscidae. A brief account of his life and career and of the various collections that he studied is given, followed by an alphabetical list of the species‐gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a key feature for distinguishing the two taxa had lost importance with Emden 's definition, and a reliable assignment of specimens to one of the two taxa was no longer possible. Since one of the two female syntypes of D. ovata (PONT & WERNER 2006) and all five female types of D. rutila in the Budapest Museum were destroyed by fire in 1956 (PONT 2013), a detailed comparison of the two species was no longer possible. In addition, Stein 's descriptions of the two species did not provide sufficient evidence that they are different taxa, and neither Curran nor Emden indicated in the supplementary characterizations of D. ovata and D. rutila that these were based on investigations of the type material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a key feature for distinguishing the two taxa had lost importance with Emden 's definition, and a reliable assignment of specimens to one of the two taxa was no longer possible. Since one of the two female syntypes of D. ovata (PONT & WERNER 2006) and all five female types of D. rutila in the Budapest Museum were destroyed by fire in 1956 (PONT 2013), a detailed comparison of the two species was no longer possible. In addition, Stein 's descriptions of the two species did not provide sufficient evidence that they are different taxa, and neither Curran nor Emden indicated in the supplementary characterizations of D. ovata and D. rutila that these were based on investigations of the type material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification seemed correct in 2014, but presently we know that the yellow-legged form of L. scalaris is rather common in S Africa. Syntypes of L. flavipes were destroyed in 1956 in Budapest (Pont 2013). I checked Stein's (1913) Paratypes 6♂, 7♀: the same data as the holotype.…”
Section: Lispe Orientalis Wiedemann 1824mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loew, 1873: 48 (Aricia) Stein, 1907: 321 (Aricia) REMARKS. According to Pont [2013]: holotype #, seen by Hennig [1963: 864] but not now in ZIN and not seen by A. Zinovjev. Pont, 1981: 427 (Phaonia) Other type material.…”
Section: Phaonia Pseudomysticamentioning
confidence: 99%