2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-005-5387-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Family of Instruments That Assess Suicide Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RFL encompasses six subscales: survival and coping beliefs, responsibility to family, child-related concerns, fear of suicide, fear of social disapproval, and moral objections. The RFL has a solid theoretical base, is extensively used in research, and has abundant evidence of reliability of scale scores in diverse populations and validity for use as a screening measure of suicide resilience (see Range, 2005) including several studies with older adults (e.g., Marty, Segal, & Coolidge, 2010;Miller, Segal, & Coolidge, 2001;Segal, Lebenson, & Coolidge, 2008;Segal & Needham, 2007). Alpha coefficients in the present sample are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The RFL encompasses six subscales: survival and coping beliefs, responsibility to family, child-related concerns, fear of suicide, fear of social disapproval, and moral objections. The RFL has a solid theoretical base, is extensively used in research, and has abundant evidence of reliability of scale scores in diverse populations and validity for use as a screening measure of suicide resilience (see Range, 2005) including several studies with older adults (e.g., Marty, Segal, & Coolidge, 2010;Miller, Segal, & Coolidge, 2001;Segal, Lebenson, & Coolidge, 2008;Segal & Needham, 2007). Alpha coefficients in the present sample are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although several other measures of suicide have been developed, the SSI remains a classic in suicide assessment because of its objectivity and pragmatism (Range, 2005). The scale has been translated and adapted into several cultures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of SI measures have been used to assess for suicidal risk (Batterham et al 2015;Range 2005;Reed and Shea 2011), recent findings point to the importance of one specific SI dimension predictive of future suicidal attempts. In a study involving 506 adolescents to young adults (aged 12-21 years), Miranda et al (2014) found that after controlling for sex, mental health diagnosis (e.g., mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use), and prior suicide attempt history, the only dimension of SI (using the Columbia Suicide Screen or CSS) to significantly and uniquely predict a suicide attempt made at follow up 4-6 years later was frequency of SI in the past 3 months (e.g., ''How often have you thought about killing yourself?'').…”
Section: Is There a Need For A New Measure Of Suicidal Ideation Frequmentioning
confidence: 99%