The Family in Question 2008
DOI: 10.1017/9789048501533.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Family in Dispute: Insiders and Outsiders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Such an approach, according to Go (2013) "would track the processes and relations between diverse but connected spaces in the making and remaking of modernity" (p. 41, emphasis in original). Relational thinking corresponds to the anti-essentialist perspectives on culture advanced by anthropologists who call for a processual view of culture as dynamic and ever changing, which serves as an alternative to structural-functionalist understandings that view culture as fixed (Vertovec 2011;Hannerz 1999;Grillo 2019). The application of a relational anti-essentialist cultural lens offers an epistemic break from substantialist structural functionalist frameworks that have unwittingly reified the nation-state as a static agent that can retain the sovereign power to expel subaltern non-citizen and citizen others.…”
Section: A Relational Socio-cultural Analytic Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Such an approach, according to Go (2013) "would track the processes and relations between diverse but connected spaces in the making and remaking of modernity" (p. 41, emphasis in original). Relational thinking corresponds to the anti-essentialist perspectives on culture advanced by anthropologists who call for a processual view of culture as dynamic and ever changing, which serves as an alternative to structural-functionalist understandings that view culture as fixed (Vertovec 2011;Hannerz 1999;Grillo 2019). The application of a relational anti-essentialist cultural lens offers an epistemic break from substantialist structural functionalist frameworks that have unwittingly reified the nation-state as a static agent that can retain the sovereign power to expel subaltern non-citizen and citizen others.…”
Section: A Relational Socio-cultural Analytic Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies and many studies on family and family migration reflect a perspective on society and family from the nation‐state–centered point of view and are thus trapped in methodological nationalism (Wimmer & Glick‐Schiller, 2002). The policies are shaped mainly by Western culture assumptions on marriage and family and framed by the boundaries of belonging to racialized and gendered imagined communities (Beck & Beck‐Gernsheim, 2010; Bonjour & de Hart, 2013; Bonjour & Duyvendak, 2018; Grillo, 2008; Jeholm & Bissenbakker, 2019; Kofman, 2004; van Walsum, 2008). This manifests in the existence of income, housing, age, and integration exam requirements (Bonjour & Kraler, 2015; Pellander, 2021; Strik et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translocal familyhood hence includes a wide spectrum of intimate relations that people practice. The boundaries between family members and others close to them, such as lovers, friends or neighbours, are not necessarily strictly defined (Grillo 2008;Hakkarainen 2015). As part of their mobility people negotiate their family memberships, social relations and belongings.…”
Section: Translocality Translocal Familyhood and Lifelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%