Abstract:This paper presents an analysis of the recent developments of average market power in Europe by using a broad firm-level database for EU member states. To indicate competitive pressure at the firm-level, markups are estimated following De Loecker (2011), and De Loecker and Warzynski (2012). The analysis reveals a sharp drop in markups during the crisis, followed by a post-crisis increase. The European average has not yet reached its pre-crisis level, which is in contrast to results for the US, where average ma… Show more
“…On the one hand, Deutsche Bundesbank () uses firm‐level data for seven European countries, covering the 27 industries over the 1996–2014 period, finding stable mark‐ups pre‐recession, with a fall afterwards . This result seem consistent with Weche and Wambach (), who use a sample of more than 3.6 million firms, covering 18 European countries for the 2007–2015 period, and finding a sharp fall in mark‐ups during the Great Recession, with some partial recovery afterwards. This pro‐cyclical behaviour of mark‐ups has also been documented for the United States (e.g.…”
Section: Research On Individual Drivers Of Inequalitysupporting
Rising income inequality has recently come centre‐stage as a core societal concern for rich countries. The diagnosis of the forces driving inequality upwards and their relative importance remain hotly contested, notably with respect to the roles of globalization versus technology and of market forces versus institutions and policy choices. This survey provides a critical review and synthesis of recent research. The focus is on income inequality across the entire distribution, rather than only on what has been happening at the very top. We pay particular attention to include what has been learned from the analysis of micro‐data, to ensure that the coverage is not unduly US‐centric and to analyses of the interrelations between the different drivers of inequality. The marked differences in inequality trends across countries and time periods reflect how global economic forces such as globalization and technological change have interacted with differing national contexts and institutions. Major analytical challenges stand in the way of a consensus emerging on the relative importance of different drivers in how income inequality has evolved in recent decades.
“…On the one hand, Deutsche Bundesbank () uses firm‐level data for seven European countries, covering the 27 industries over the 1996–2014 period, finding stable mark‐ups pre‐recession, with a fall afterwards . This result seem consistent with Weche and Wambach (), who use a sample of more than 3.6 million firms, covering 18 European countries for the 2007–2015 period, and finding a sharp fall in mark‐ups during the Great Recession, with some partial recovery afterwards. This pro‐cyclical behaviour of mark‐ups has also been documented for the United States (e.g.…”
Section: Research On Individual Drivers Of Inequalitysupporting
Rising income inequality has recently come centre‐stage as a core societal concern for rich countries. The diagnosis of the forces driving inequality upwards and their relative importance remain hotly contested, notably with respect to the roles of globalization versus technology and of market forces versus institutions and policy choices. This survey provides a critical review and synthesis of recent research. The focus is on income inequality across the entire distribution, rather than only on what has been happening at the very top. We pay particular attention to include what has been learned from the analysis of micro‐data, to ensure that the coverage is not unduly US‐centric and to analyses of the interrelations between the different drivers of inequality. The marked differences in inequality trends across countries and time periods reflect how global economic forces such as globalization and technological change have interacted with differing national contexts and institutions. Major analytical challenges stand in the way of a consensus emerging on the relative importance of different drivers in how income inequality has evolved in recent decades.
“…The authors also find that digital intensive sectors have higher markups than other sectors. Weche and Wambach (2018) analyse the markup for seventeen EU countries from 2007 to 2015. Contrary to the previous papers, they find that the average weighted markup hardly increased over this time period.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies find that markups in the US and Europe have increased only moderately or even remained more or less stable (i.e. Traina, 2018;De Loecker et al, 2018;Hall, 2018;Cavalleri et al, 2019;Weche and Wambach, 2018). These differing results have triggered a discussion on methodology (see e.g.…”
We follow the production function approach to assess markups, which requires the estimation of the output elasticity of a free input. In the basic setup we estimate a structural value added production function, using temporary contract hours as free input. We find rather stable markups in the Netherlands in the period 2006-2016. We show that extending the free variable incorrectly with fixed contract hours results in an increasing markup. Findings are robust to an alternative setup, in which a gross output function is specified and materials are used as free input. Implications for applied work and policy are discussed.
“…This in turn has led to wealth transfers between consumers and firms, which can cause macroeconomic imbalances (Khan and Vaheesan [2017]). Also, the recent economic literature emphasizes various negative welfare effects (on macroeconomic as well as on dynamic welfare) from an increase in industry concentration and market power across many markets, particularly in the U.S. but also internationally (although more mixed across Europe, see Weche & Wambach [2018]), which are considerably weakening the process of competition (Autor et al [2017]; Grullon et al [2017]; Gutiérrez and Philippon [2018]). 14 6.…”
Section: Economic Reasons For Reinvigorating Competition Policy On Exmentioning
Cet article analyse les concepts d’abus d’exploitation et de dépendance économique, non seulement sous le prisme de la jurisprudence concurrentielle européenne mais également sous celui de l’économie industrielle. Bien que les racines théoriques de ces concepts reposent sur la théorie économique, ils ont été ignorés ou peu pris en compte dans le contexte de l’application du droit de la concurrence. Une approche fondée sur les effets ( effects-based ) devrait tenir compte de ces pratiques et pourrait fournir des indications sur la façon d’analyser leurs impacts. Nous nous appuyons sur deux exemples tirés des industries agro-alimentaires et de l’économie numérique. Le présent article souligne l’existence d’un paradoxe : bien que les modèles d’organisation industrielle fournissent des outils pertinents pour caractériser ces abus, évaluer leurs effets et concevoir des mesures correctives, ils demeurent peu utilisés dans la pratique décisionnelle. Classification JEL: K21, L12, L40, L42
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.