2015
DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2015.1061817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fair Work Act: Encouraging collective agreement-making but leaving collective bargaining to choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bray et al., 2014: ch. 11; Coulthard, 2012; Gahan and Pekarek, 2012; Walpole, 2015). This section provides a very brief outline of their origins, the key parts of the current FW Act and comparisons with other countries.…”
Section: The (Unusual) Law On Nuca-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bray et al., 2014: ch. 11; Coulthard, 2012; Gahan and Pekarek, 2012; Walpole, 2015). This section provides a very brief outline of their origins, the key parts of the current FW Act and comparisons with other countries.…”
Section: The (Unusual) Law On Nuca-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an employee is represented by a union in bargaining, the employer is required to recognise and bargain with that union in good faith. However, agreements can still be made between employers and employees without union involvement and without negotiation of terms (see further Walpole, 2015). In common with the earlier legislation, employers can initiate the agreement-making process and seek approval of their proposed agreement after 21 days have elapsed without anything further, if no bargaining representative has sought to be recognised for that purpose.…”
Section: The (Unusual) Law On Nuca-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics note majoritarian membership criteria work well where union presence is strong but are ill‐suited for weakly organised workplaces. Card checks or employee petitions may offer more favourable outcomes to unions than ballots (Forsyth et al ., ; Walpole, ).…”
Section: Comparative Anglophone Bargaining Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In not specifying in detail the substantive differences between union and non-union collective agreements, the Fair Work Act cannot be said truly to live up to its promise to 're-collectivise' employment relations (Walpole 2015). This, in combination with the electoral damage caused by WorkChoices in 2010, explains why the Coalition has been largely unsuccessful in attempts to alter the Fair Work framework since its reelection in 2013.…”
Section: Momentary Change Amid Continuity In Employment Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet Fair Work did not take Australia back to the regulatory framework that existed before or during the Accord. Australia's employment relations system has remained relatively decentralised (Walpole 2015;Olson 2019). In that sense WorkChoices has left a legacy.…”
Section: What Is the Latest? A Comparative-historical Analysis For Our Timementioning
confidence: 99%