The factors affecting the institutionalisation of two policy units in Burkina Faso’s health system: a case study

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper is one of three linked studies that attempts to understand the process of institutionalisation of policy units within Burkina Faso’s health system. It examines the relationships between the existence of an institutional framework, data production capacity and other resource availability in the institutionalisation of policy units in health systems. It therefore contributes to our understanding of the dynamics linking the key drivers and indicators of institutionalisation. Additionally, it examines how factors within the managerial setting, including workplace environment, and budgetary and human resource availability, may influence the institutionalisation process.MethodsThe study used an explanatory qualitative case study approach, examining two policy units in Burkina Faso’s Ministry of Health, the first of which had been institutionalised successfully and the other less so. Data were collected from key policymakers, including 13 connected with the first policy unit and 10 with the second, plus two funders. We also conducted a documentary analysis of the National Program for Health Development, two mid-term strategic plans, 230 action plans, eight Ministry of Health state budgets, eight Ministry of Health annual statistics reports, 16 policy unit budgets and published literature.ResultsThe framework within which the government gave the policy unit its mandate and policy focus had the strongest effect on the institutionalisation process. Institutionalisation depended on political will, in both the host government and any donors, and the priority given to the policy unit’s focus. It was also affected by the leadership of the policy unit managers. These factors were influenced by human resource capacity, and our findings suggest that, for successful institutionalisation in Burkina Faso’s health system, policy units need to be given sufficient human resources to achieve their objectives.ConclusionPolicy units’ institutionalisation in Burkina Faso’s health system depend on the leadership of the unit managers to implement relevant activities, mobilise funding, and recruit and maintain enough human resources, as well as the mandate given by the government.

A scoping review of the uses and institutionalisation of knowledge for health policy in low- and middle-income countries

“…Recent research in this area (and after our seach cutoff) provides an idea of how process-oriented research on institutionalisation of knowledge use in LMIC health systems might be conducted. One is a body of work devoted to the formation of institutionalised structures for knowledge-informed policy-making in Burkina Faso [86][87][88]. This work is notable for the extent to which it implicitly addresses all three dimensions of institutionalisation (regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive) as well as its practical implications for health system development.…”

Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe

“…This strategic and policy embedment provides the Network with an official mandate for its work. It encourages member countries and holds them accountable to increase their investments in KT, including the establishment of KTPs in line with EVIPNet Europe’s aim to foster the systematic use of information in decision-making [ 34 ], which would in turn provide a country-level mandate for EIP and a greater likelihood of sustainability [ 60 ].…”

“…Thus, it is in a privileged position to take the lead to support member countries to institutionalise EIP. The institutionalisation of EIP will require multiple and concerted efforts and high-level commitment from all players – at country level from policy-makers, researchers and the civil society and across all levels of the EVIPNet network, including the EVIPNet Europe Secretariat, WHO country offices and country teams/member countries [ 28 , 60 – 62 ]. Further, as shown in previous evaluations, for KTPs to have the greatest chance of success and institutionalisation, it will be important to ensure a clear mandate, strong leadership, and sufficient funding and human resources [ 28 , 60 , 62 , 63 ].…”

How Do Countries Use Resource Tracking Data to Inform Policy Change: Shining Light into the Black Box

“…Zida et al, reviewing Burkina Faso's institutional structure for health financing analytics, posit that the regulatory framework that authorizes the policy unit to exist and function helped to make this unit effective. 36 In contrast, when the contested presidential elections replaced the champions, Burundi lost its continuity in reforming health financing policy through the use of evidence.…”