2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-017-9522-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Factor Structure of the Twelve Items General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): a Population Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in disagreement with some studies [ 14 , 16 18 ], findings of the present study showed although the unidimensional model with adjusting wording effects associated with negatively and positively phrased items considerably improved fit indices compared to the One-Dimensional model, it did not give a suitable fit compared to Three and Four-Dimension models in our population. Following these findings in our study, similar results were observed in some studies [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, in disagreement with some studies [ 14 , 16 18 ], findings of the present study showed although the unidimensional model with adjusting wording effects associated with negatively and positively phrased items considerably improved fit indices compared to the One-Dimensional model, it did not give a suitable fit compared to Three and Four-Dimension models in our population. Following these findings in our study, similar results were observed in some studies [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings of the current study showed One-Dimensional model had a worst fit than the alternative models. In agreement with our results, many studies are available in favor of the multidimensional compared to the unidimensional structure of GHQ-12 around the world among various populations such as the employee population [ 17 ], diseases-specific populations [ 28 , 49 ], and adolescents and general populations [ 16 , 22 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hankins31 found that, after modelling the wording effects for the NW items, the unidimensional model fitted better than both the two-factor model (NW vs PW items) and Graetz’s three-factor model. Other studies have called into question the substantive meaning of the GHQ-12 multifactor solutions, suggesting that they might just be an artefact due to the wording effects associated with NW items 29 30 34–40. See Molina et al 36 for a deeper review about the dimensionality of GHQ-12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, another source of variability in the results about the factor structure of the GHQ-12 could come from the statistical control of method biases, which has been mainly achieved through the correlated traits–correlated methods (CTCM) and the correlated traits–correlated uniquenesses (CTCU) confirmatory factor analysis models. Both procedures have been used in GHQ-12, to deal with method effects applying the CTCM model,30 44 the CTCU model29 31 39 40 or both CTCM and CTCU models 34–37…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%