2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00302-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The factor structure for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in recent-onset psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
206
3
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
16
206
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…PANSS scores revealed high levels of positive and negative symptoms, signifying a relatively severe level of illness-mean PANSS subscale scores in this sample appear to have been greater than those reported in other first-episode samples, [22,23] although no direct comparison of means was calculated. Furthermore, the median DUP in this sample (42 weeks) was relatively consistent with those reported from other first-episode cohorts [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…PANSS scores revealed high levels of positive and negative symptoms, signifying a relatively severe level of illness-mean PANSS subscale scores in this sample appear to have been greater than those reported in other first-episode samples, [22,23] although no direct comparison of means was calculated. Furthermore, the median DUP in this sample (42 weeks) was relatively consistent with those reported from other first-episode cohorts [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…[10][11][12] Our model accounted for 58.44% of the total variance; this is very similar to previous results, which ranged from 53.4 to 59.83%. 7,10 As in other studies, the internal consistency we obtained was good (. 0.8) for the negative and disorganized factors, and acceptable (.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…0.7) for the remaining factors. 10,13 Regarding the composition of individual factors, the negative factor accounted for the greatest individual contribution to variance in the final model (27.97%). 7 The second most robust factor was the ''disorganization/ cognitive'' (11.75%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an initial exploration of this area, we chose to examine two nonpsychotic but clinically relevant domains, attentional impairment 127,128 and anxiety. 129,130 Both domains can present as early as preschool age. The relationship between infant sensory gating and preschool symptomology was explored in 48 children (24 with robust infant P50 sensory gating and 24 with impaired P50 sensory gating).…”
Section: The Endophenotype Predicts Elevated Risk For Schizophrenia-amentioning
confidence: 99%