1956
DOI: 10.1037/h0048754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overlearning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
3

Year Published

1960
1960
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
65
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the expectation according to the findings of Nakagawa (1980aNakagawa ( , 1980bNakagawa ( , 1999a. These findings are also explained by extant theories of discrimination learning: acquired cue distinctiveness theory (Lawrence, 1949(Lawrence, , 1950, response of discrimination theory (Pubols, 1956;Reid, 1953), selective attention theory (Mackintosh, 1965a), analyzer hierarchy theory (Sutherland & Mackintosh, 1971), and response strategy or response pattern theory (Hall, 1973a(Hall, , 1973b(Hall, , 1974Mandler, 1966Mandler, , 1968Mandler & Hooper, 1967). All these theories predict that overtraining should produce comparable positive ORE in Groups Wand eMS, and the results were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These findings are consistent with the expectation according to the findings of Nakagawa (1980aNakagawa ( , 1980bNakagawa ( , 1999a. These findings are also explained by extant theories of discrimination learning: acquired cue distinctiveness theory (Lawrence, 1949(Lawrence, , 1950, response of discrimination theory (Pubols, 1956;Reid, 1953), selective attention theory (Mackintosh, 1965a), analyzer hierarchy theory (Sutherland & Mackintosh, 1971), and response strategy or response pattern theory (Hall, 1973a(Hall, , 1973b(Hall, , 1974Mandler, 1966Mandler, , 1968Mandler & Hooper, 1967). All these theories predict that overtraining should produce comparable positive ORE in Groups Wand eMS, and the results were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is this sort of invisible shift in stimulus control, covered up by an unchanging error score, that is probably responsible for the effects of overtraining on the learning of discrimination reversals (Mackintosh, 1965c;Pubols, 1956). Rather than inferring shifting states of attention during overtraining (Mackintosh, 1965a), the error score should be abandoned as an appropriate measure of stimulus control in these experiments and replaced by direct measurement of the controlling relations pertinent to the experimental question.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained results were also explained by the two-factor theory of discrimination learning. On the other hand, other studies with human adults (Grant & Berg, 1948 ;Stevenson & Moushegian, 1956) and with rats (Capaldi & Stevenson, 1957 ;Pubols, 1956;Reid, 1953) found only a decrease in number of trials to reach criterion in the second discrimination problem with the increase of training trials on the original discrimination learning. It should he noticed that the effect of the prior training was examined only when the original discrimination task was completely learned or overlearned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%