2012
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2011.610433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Faceted Catalog as a Tool for Searching Monographic Series: Usability Study of Lens

Abstract: This study explored the functionality of the University of Chicago's faceted catalog, Lens, in respect to monographic series. A user study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of Lens in searching for monographic series and also to determine whether controlled series access in the catalog record improves the search results. The results of the study indicate that while Lens could be considered an adequate tool for searching series that are known to be published under the same title, some changes would make i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One exception is Walsh, who observed three graduate students and two faculty members searching for monographic series in a library catalog, which led to UX recommendations related to both cataloging practice and interface design. 6 Walsh's 2012 paper may stand alone as an example of UX research with a technical services perspective, but technical services staff were conducting research into users' search behavior years before UX appeared in the library literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exception is Walsh, who observed three graduate students and two faculty members searching for monographic series in a library catalog, which led to UX recommendations related to both cataloging practice and interface design. 6 Walsh's 2012 paper may stand alone as an example of UX research with a technical services perspective, but technical services staff were conducting research into users' search behavior years before UX appeared in the library literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%