2006
DOI: 10.1080/09537280600901269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The FABMAS multi-agent-system prototype for production control of water fabs: design, implementation and performance assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two directions for future research. It seems to be possible to use this ontology in connection with the content and coordination language suggested for FABMAS [3]. More sophisticated interactions scenarios have to be researched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are two directions for future research. It seems to be possible to use this ontology in connection with the content and coordination language suggested for FABMAS [3]. More sophisticated interactions scenarios have to be researched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Staff agents solve problems like assignment and sequencing problems for lots waiting in front of machines for the decision-making agents. In order to solve manufacturing problems, the following generic functionality is provided by staff agents [3], [6]: When ϕ ω is not valid, an ad-hoc strategy to select parameters has to be used.…”
Section: Architecture Of Adaptive Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wu and Chien 2008), • usage of modern software technologies like software agents or service-oriented architectures (cf. Mönch et al 2006, Yoon and Shen 2008, Qui 2007), • application of distributed simulation techniques, • development of advanced forecasting techniques, • Fab economics for modeling economical implications for semiconductor industry (cf. Leachman, Ding, and Ching 2007).…”
Section: Motivation For This Panel Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%