The Extraterritorial Scope of the Right to Punish

Chehtman, Alejandro

doi:10.1007/s10982-009-9052-3

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In alphabetical order, the ten articles from law were: Addo ; Austin ; Braman, Kahan, and Hoffman ; Bray ; Chehtman ; Georgosouli ; Marino, Matsusaka, and Zábojník ; Roberts and Saunders ; Schragger ; Van den Steen . Although none of these articles mentions philosophy as a subject area, some draw on literature familiar to philosophers, and certain of the uses are similar.…”

Section: Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Distinctive Is Philosophers’ Intuition Talk?

Andow

2015

Metaphilosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The word "intuition" is one frequently used in philosophy. It is often assumed that the way in which philosophers use the word, and others like it, is very distinctive. This claim has been subjected to little empirical scrutiny, however. This article presents the first steps in a qualitative analysis of the use of intuition talk in the academy. It presents the findings of two preliminary empirical studies. The first study examines the use of intuition talk in spoken academic English. The second examines the use of intuition talk in written academic English. It considers what these studies tell us about the distinctiveness of philosophical language and methods and considers some implications for evaluative and ameliorative methodology.

show abstract

Section: Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4.2.2. Law.In alphabetical order, the ten articles from law were: Addo 2010; Austin 2010;Braman, Kahan, and Hoffman 2010;Bray 2010;Chehtman 2010;Georgosouli 2010;Marino, Matsusaka, and Zábojník 2010;Roberts and Saunders 2010;Schragger 2009; Van den Steen 2010.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

How Distinctive Is Philosophers’ Intuition Talk?

Andow

2015

Metaphilosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3(5)). Chehtman () challenges the normative justifiability of passive personality jurisdiction but finds a more convincing case in defending the protective principle.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Subjects of Collectively Binding Decisions: Democratic Inclusion and Extraterritorial Law

Beckman

2014

Ratio Juris

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citizenship and residency are basic conditions for political inclusion in a democracy. However, if democracy is premised on the inclusion of everyone subject to collectively binding decisions, the relevance of either citizenship or residency for recognition as a member of the polity is uncertain. The aim of this paper is to specify the conditions for being subject to collective decisions in the sense relevant to democratic theory. Three conceptions of what it means to be subject to collectively binding decisions are identified and examined, referring to those subject to legal duties and legal powers or to those subject to legal duties and state institutions. The contrast between them is most clearly illustrated in relation to non‐residents, those not present in the territory of the state. The extraterritorial dimension of the law thus highlights a fundamental ambiguity in the theory of democracy concerning the extension of political rights.

show abstract

The Extraterritorial Scope of the Right to Punish

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

How Distinctive Is Philosophers’ Intuition Talk?

How Distinctive Is Philosophers’ Intuition Talk?

The Subjects of Collectively Binding Decisions: Democratic Inclusion and Extraterritorial Law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About