2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSERVATIONS

Abstract: Ground-based observatories have been collecting 0.2 − 20 TeV gamma rays from blazars for about twenty years. These gamma rays can experience absorption along the line of sight due to interactions with the extragalactic background light (EBL). In this paper, we show that the gamma-ray optical depth can be reduced to the convolution product of an EBL kernel with the EBL intensity, assuming a particular form for the EBL evolution. We extract the absorption signal from the most extensive set of TeV spectra from bl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
360
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
27
360
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to B0 218+357, the MAGIC collaboration used 11.8 h of observations from a 2014 flare of 1ES 1011+496 (z = 0.212) (Ahnen et al 2016) to obtain a scaling factor for the EBL models α DOM11 = 1.07(−0.20, +0.24) stat + sys and α FRA08 = 1.14(−0.14, +0.09) stat . This was followed by a study using eight high-frequency-peaked BL Lac and four FSRQs within the redshift range of 0.031 < z < 0.944 (which also includes the observations of the two aforementioned sources), where a scaling factor of α DOM11 = 0.99(−0.56, +0.15) stat + sys was derived (Mazin et al 2016) Correction Ahnen et al (2016) and Mazin et al (2016) (purple square); the Fermi-LAT points from Ackermann et al (2012) and the combined ground-based points from Biteau & Williams (2015) (orange circles). The black upward triangle is the value derived in this work using a combination of power-law and log-parabola models, whereas the green downward triangle shows the value derived when only considering log-parabola models.…”
Section: Discussion a N D C O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to B0 218+357, the MAGIC collaboration used 11.8 h of observations from a 2014 flare of 1ES 1011+496 (z = 0.212) (Ahnen et al 2016) to obtain a scaling factor for the EBL models α DOM11 = 1.07(−0.20, +0.24) stat + sys and α FRA08 = 1.14(−0.14, +0.09) stat . This was followed by a study using eight high-frequency-peaked BL Lac and four FSRQs within the redshift range of 0.031 < z < 0.944 (which also includes the observations of the two aforementioned sources), where a scaling factor of α DOM11 = 0.99(−0.56, +0.15) stat + sys was derived (Mazin et al 2016) Correction Ahnen et al (2016) and Mazin et al (2016) (purple square); the Fermi-LAT points from Ackermann et al (2012) and the combined ground-based points from Biteau & Williams (2015) (orange circles). The black upward triangle is the value derived in this work using a combination of power-law and log-parabola models, whereas the green downward triangle shows the value derived when only considering log-parabola models.…”
Section: Discussion a N D C O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas direct measurements of the NIRB report a large flux above that of the integrated light of resolved galaxies (e.g., Dwek & Arendt 1998;Matsumoto et al 2005), the levels inferred by γ-ray absorption studies are much lower (Ackermann et al 2012; H.E.S.S. Collaboration 2013; Biteau & Williams 2015;Ahnen 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, they require modeling of the EBL spectrum. While the understanding of EBL has significantly improved over the last decade (see [51,54] and references therein), some uncertainties still remain [55,56]. In Refs.…”
Section: Photon Decay To Ementioning
confidence: 99%