2019
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The External Genitalia Score (EGS): A European Multicenter Validation Study

Abstract: Context Standardized description of external genitalia is needed in the assessment of children with atypical genitalia. Objectives To validate the External Genitalia Score (EGS), to present reference values for preterm and term babies up to 24 months and correlate obtained scores with anogenital distances (AGDs). Design, Setting A European multicenter (n = 8)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our data demonstrate that pubertal development does not strongly correlate to the degree of virilization of the external genitalia at birth in 46,XY DSD caused by NR5A1 mutations. All patients who presented in early infancy had very low External Genitalia Scores ranging from 3.5 to 5.5 (EGS in male babies (0-1 months, > 37th weeks of gestation, birth weight 2500-4000 g) with typical genital phenotypes: median = 12, 10th percentile = 10.5, and 90th percentile = 12 [33]). Therefore, several patients were first assigned female after birth but soon reassigned as male due to further evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, our data demonstrate that pubertal development does not strongly correlate to the degree of virilization of the external genitalia at birth in 46,XY DSD caused by NR5A1 mutations. All patients who presented in early infancy had very low External Genitalia Scores ranging from 3.5 to 5.5 (EGS in male babies (0-1 months, > 37th weeks of gestation, birth weight 2500-4000 g) with typical genital phenotypes: median = 12, 10th percentile = 10.5, and 90th percentile = 12 [33]). Therefore, several patients were first assigned female after birth but soon reassigned as male due to further evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients 1-4, ambiguous genitalia with signs of undervirilization and significantly reduced external genitalia scores (EGS; normal > 10.5 [33]) were noticed at birth with a median EGS of 4.3 (range 3.5-5.5). Patient 5 showed a clitoromegaly and rugated labioscrotal folds at birth but EGS in this patient as well as in patient 6 could not be calculated due to insufficient phenotypic information.…”
Section: Presenting Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all patients, the karyotype was verified through medical records. Clinical data extracted from medical records included information on; 1) external genital phenotype at time of diagnosis, scored according to the External Genitalia Score (EGS) ranging from 0-12 points, with increasing scores indicating increasing degrees of androgenization ( 26 ); 2) spontaneous pubertal onset (yes, no); 3) type of testosterone treatment (transdermal, intramuscular, none) if the patient was substituted with testosterone at the time of blood sampling; 4) gonadal surgery (biopsy, gonadectomy); and 5) semen analysis (azoospermia, concentration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In boys, the presence of neonatal cryptorchidism (particularly the bilateral forms) and micropenis are important findings, pointing to a prenatal and postnatal gonadotropin deficiency. All boys with an underdeveloped (at least 2.5 SD below the mean) but otherwise normal penis, without hypospadias, should be further investigated to exclude CHH, based on baseline assessment of the HPG axis during minipuberty (~1–4 months after birth), or an HCG stimulation test thereafter, due to the physiological reduction of gonadotropins until puberty [ 2 , 21 ]. More complex forms of genital under-virilization are more likely due to hypergonadotropic hypogonadism rather than CHH [ 6 , 22 ].…”
Section: Central Hypogonadismmentioning
confidence: 99%