1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1978.tb00480.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Extent of Individual Changes in I.Q. For Ages Between 6 Months and 17 Years, in a British Longitudinal Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation of 0.67 between IQs before and after adoption is moderate and indicates a degree of stability close to the stability found in longitudinal studies of biological children who have not undergone an environmental change (r ϭ 0.60 between 4 and 5 or 14 and 15 years of age) (41,42). Thus, on the basis of IQ at the end of the preschool period, the results show that there is a moderate stability for rank (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The correlation of 0.67 between IQs before and after adoption is moderate and indicates a degree of stability close to the stability found in longitudinal studies of biological children who have not undergone an environmental change (r ϭ 0.60 between 4 and 5 or 14 and 15 years of age) (41,42). Thus, on the basis of IQ at the end of the preschool period, the results show that there is a moderate stability for rank (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, there is now evidence that while Volume 15, Number 4, April 1982 2/5 data taken from populations may show high stability, this masks large changes among sub-groups. Hindley and Owen (1978), for example, report that between the ages of 3 and 17 years the IQ scores of 25% of their sample changed by 22 points or more, despite an overall correlation for the total group of .53. Similar results have been found by McCall, Applebaum, & Hogarty (1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We believe this inflation was due to the subscale and DQ formulae adjusting insufficiently for infant age, which we corrected in the current study by linear regression. However, it should be noted that our unadjusted scores fell into the general range reported for middle-class children in Sweden (Klackenberg-Larsson & Stensson, 1968), England (Hindley & Owen, 1978), and for African Americans (Golden, Birns, & Bridger, 1971). To further increase reliability, we also utilized a total score by adding the subscale age-adjusted scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%