1985
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198511000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Extensor Digitorum Brevis as a Muscle Island Flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also suggested that the flap can extend up to the lateral malleolar region without any difficulty. Subsequently, various authors have reported the advantages of ankle and foot soft tissue defect reconstruction using an EDB flap [19-21]. As the clinical applications of EDB free flaps are gaining increasing importance, the morphometric findings of the present study will be of help to plastic and orthopedic surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They also suggested that the flap can extend up to the lateral malleolar region without any difficulty. Subsequently, various authors have reported the advantages of ankle and foot soft tissue defect reconstruction using an EDB flap [19-21]. As the clinical applications of EDB free flaps are gaining increasing importance, the morphometric findings of the present study will be of help to plastic and orthopedic surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The EDB muscle flap has been a selection for local soft tissue reconstruction since the 1970s. 1 3 EDB is located on the dorsum of the foot and supplements the action of extensor digitorum longus and extensor hallucis longus in extending the medial 4 toes. As such, it is expendable and may be used in reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle as a local muscle flap has been described in the published reports for reconstruction around the ankle and distal lower leg, but case numbers are limited. [16][17][18] The proponents of this flap argue the major advantages to be easy and rapid dissection, a constant vascular pedicle, a wide arc of rotation, minimal donor site morbidity and provision of bulk and well-vascularized muscle to obliterate dead space and deter infection. Apart from the dorsalis pedis artery being sacrificed in raising the flap, one obvious limitation of this flap in our setting is that disuse atrophy restricts its application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%