2012
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution

Abstract: In recent years, a number of researchers have advocated extending the modern synthesis in evolutionary biology. One of the core arguments made in favour of an extension comes from work on soft inheritance systems, including transgenerational epigenetic effects, cultural transmission and niche construction. In this study, we outline this claim and then take issue with it. We argue that the focus on soft inheritance has led to a conflation of proximate and ultimate causation, which has in turn obscured key quest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
110
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasticity is typically considered to be a genetically specified, and hence evolvable, trait that allows individuals to match phenotypes to local conditions [91,92], and the same logic is used to accommodate non-genetic inheritance and niche construction in evolutionary theory (e.g. [88,93]). …”
Section: A Traditional Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasticity is typically considered to be a genetically specified, and hence evolvable, trait that allows individuals to match phenotypes to local conditions [91,92], and the same logic is used to accommodate non-genetic inheritance and niche construction in evolutionary theory (e.g. [88,93]). …”
Section: A Traditional Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural evolution researchers are sometimes accused of making overblown claims about the causal role of culture in explaining human behaviour (Dickins and Rahman 2012;El Mouden et al 2014;Scott-Phillips et al 2011). This is typically placed within the context of the proximate-ultimate distinction (Mayr 1961;Tinbergen 1963).…”
Section: Is Culture Proximate or Ultimate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers coming from sociobiology and evolutionary psychology have typically argued that culture is proximate: a mechanism set up by genes to maximise inclusive fitness (Dickins and Rahman 2012;El Mouden et al 2014;Scott-Phillips et al 2011). There is merit in this argument: after all, the capacity for culture evolved genetically because it increased inclusive fitness, as explored by numerous gene-culture coevolution analyses Richerson 1985, 1995).…”
Section: Is Culture Proximate or Ultimate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, these considerations would redefine what has been known to date as evolution and inheritance (Jablonka & Raz 2009). Notwithstanding, Dickins and Rahman (2012) in their strong and solid defense of the modern synthesis argue that epigenetic inheritance has place in the modern synthesis because epigenetic processes are proximate mechanisms designed to calibrate organisms to stochastic environments and these mechanisms are under genetic control. Epigenetic mechanisms cannot be considered as ultimate causes nor how DNA or genes work, for instance.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the concepts of evolution require population demonstration of the effects of epigenetic inheritance and so far, there is no evidence presented about it. The linking and grooming behaviour in rodents could be an adaptation to a stressful situation in order to make a profit, in this case a faster maturation and reproduction of their puppies (calibration) (Dickins & Rahman 2012).…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%