2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2008.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The extended and generalized Shapley value: Simultaneous consideration of coalitional externalities and coalitional structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, let us consider a payoff of player 1 in this game that we will denote ϕ 1 (v). This payoff, according to the extensions of the Shapley value to games with externalities by Pham do and Norde [16], McQuillin [11], Bolger [2], Macho-Stadler et al [10], and Hu and Yang [9], respectively, is as follows:…”
Section: Marginality Approach and Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Now, let us consider a payoff of player 1 in this game that we will denote ϕ 1 (v). This payoff, according to the extensions of the Shapley value to games with externalities by Pham do and Norde [16], McQuillin [11], Bolger [2], Macho-Stadler et al [10], and Hu and Yang [9], respectively, is as follows:…”
Section: Marginality Approach and Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is called (Weak) Monotonicity. Indeed, the fact that Myerson's value violates Monotonicity is the main reason why it was criticized in the literature as unintuitive [10,3,11]. Formally, we have the following definition:…”
Section: Weak and Strong Monotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, some game theorists study extensions of the Shapley value for games in partition function form. For instance, Potter (2000), Fujinaka (2004), Albizuri et al (2005), Macho-Stadler et al (2007), Dutta et al (2008) and McQuillin (2009) are contributions to this line of research. The axiomatic approach is one of methods to justify solution concepts for coalitional games.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%