2013
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2013.11434453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Expression of Equivalence Classes Influenced by Distractors During DMTS Test Trials

Abstract: the formation of the equivalence classes. Processes responsible for this outcome were discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have found that specific overt responses (e.g., singing, counting backwards, solving simple multiplication problems) emitted during MTS tests may cause performance to deteriorate. Although Arntzen and Vie () found that distracter tasks did not interfere with the formation of equivalence classes, the tasks suppressed responding. Clough et al () found that vocal blocking resulted in deteriorated sequencing performance in a visual sequencing task analogous to MTS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Researchers have found that specific overt responses (e.g., singing, counting backwards, solving simple multiplication problems) emitted during MTS tests may cause performance to deteriorate. Although Arntzen and Vie () found that distracter tasks did not interfere with the formation of equivalence classes, the tasks suppressed responding. Clough et al () found that vocal blocking resulted in deteriorated sequencing performance in a visual sequencing task analogous to MTS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the present experiment, one reason that SMTS and DMTS with shorter delays (0 s) did not produce subsequent class enhancement may be that "supplementary activity" toward the stimuli was less likely because comparison choices could be made within a very short time. Evidence supporting this notion is provided by experiments that have reported reduced equivalence yields when distractors have been introduced during emergent-relations tests (Arntzen, 2006;Arntzen & Vie, 2013). Use of talk-aloud protocols can also shed light on ongoing behavior in delayed matching-to-sample procedures (Vie & Arntzen, 2017).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In studies employing betweengroup analyses, networks with greater volume also have shown lower response strength (Arntzen & Holth, 2000). That is, when response strength and volume both were high, the networks appeared to be resistant to counterforce (Arntzen & Vie, 2013). Of course, the present account is not an exhaustive literature review.…”
Section: Summary Of Support For Predictions 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 84%