2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experiences of foster carers and facilitators of Fostering Connections: The Trauma-informed Foster Care Program: A process study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the apparent imposition of the professional role, the carers emphasised that the process of professional development, for example through training and learning about issues like trauma, enabled them to be more effective in their role, such as responding more effectively to children’s difficult behaviour, echoing similar findings in evaluations of the impact of foster carer training (Lotty, Dunn-Galvin and Bantry-White, 2020; Lotty, Bantry-White and Dunn-Galvin, 2020). Furthermore, learning to speak the same ‘language’ as professionals helped to ensure that carers’ concerns were taken seriously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Despite the apparent imposition of the professional role, the carers emphasised that the process of professional development, for example through training and learning about issues like trauma, enabled them to be more effective in their role, such as responding more effectively to children’s difficult behaviour, echoing similar findings in evaluations of the impact of foster carer training (Lotty, Dunn-Galvin and Bantry-White, 2020; Lotty, Bantry-White and Dunn-Galvin, 2020). Furthermore, learning to speak the same ‘language’ as professionals helped to ensure that carers’ concerns were taken seriously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Of these, we defined 27 as conceptually and/or empirically ‘thin’, whereby they provided limited description of intervention implementation and acceptability [ 60 , 68 , 77 – 79 , 81 , 82 , 84 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 91 , 94 , 96 98 , 101 , 102 , 106 , 111 115 , 117 , 118 , 183 ]. Meanwhile, 23 were considered conceptually and/or empirically ‘rich’, presenting detailed data and analysis of contextual characteristics that might structure intervention functioning through their influence on implementation and acceptability [ 72 , 74 , 80 , 83 , 86 , 93 , 95 , 99 , 100 , 103 105 , 107 110 , 116 , 119 , 175 , 182 , 184 – 186 ]. This set of rich process evaluations had theoretical generalisability beyond the immediate evaluation context.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TICI specifically targeted patients (e.g., Clarke, 2012 ; Forrest et al, 2018 ; Habib, et al, 2013 ; Marrow et al, 2012 ), staff (e.g., Crable et al, 2013 ; Hale & Wendler, 2023 ; Russell et al, 2009 ), and caregivers (e.g., Hodgdon et al, 2013 ; Regan et al, 2017 ), or a combination thereof. While it may seem evident to target patients with TICI, some authors posit the importance of also including direct care staff (e.g., Wolf et al, 2014 ) and caregivers (e.g., Lotty et al, 2020 ; Sullivan et al, 2016 ) in the cultivation of trauma-informed organizations that engender safety, trustworthiness, support, collaboration, and empowerment. Moreover, perhaps we need to consider not only multiple target audiences but also the complexity of how these audiences interact dynamically within TICI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%