The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rise in preprinting, triggered by the need for open and rapid dissemination of research outputs. We surveyed authors of COVID-19 preprints to learn about their experiences with preprinting their work and also with publishing their work in a peer-reviewed journal. Our research had the following objectives: 1. to learn about authors’ experiences with preprinting, their motivations, and future intentions; 2. to consider preprints in terms of their effectiveness in enabling authors to receive feedback on their work; 3. to compare the impact of feedback on preprints with the impact of comments of editors and reviewers on papers submitted to journals. In our survey, 78% of the new adopters of preprinting reported the intention to also preprint their future work. The boost in preprinting may therefore have a structural effect that will last after the pandemic, although future developments will also depend on other factors, including the broader growth in the adoption of open science practices. A total of 53% of the respondents reported that they had received feedback on their preprints. However, more than half of the feedback was received through “closed” channels–privately to the authors. This means that preprinting was a useful way to receive feedback on research, but the value of feedback could be increased further by facilitating and promoting “open” channels for preprint feedback. Almost a quarter of the feedback received by respondents consisted of detailed comments, showing the potential of preprint feedback to provide valuable comments on research. Respondents also reported that, compared to preprint feedback, journal peer review was more likely to lead to major changes to their work, suggesting that journal peer review provides significant added value compared to feedback received on preprints.

To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey

“…It enables immediate publication of research papers and may help to avoid duplicate work and prevent other researchers from pursuing unproductive research directions (Puebla et al, 2021). Preprinting also allows authors to receive fast feedback on their work (Malički et al, 2021;Rzayeva et al, 2023), to claim priority for their work (Ginsparg, 2016;Vale & Hyman, 2016) and to get "scoop protection" (Pulverer, 2016). In addition, as permanent citable records, preprints can be used as proof of productivity, especially for early-career researchers and researchers who do not intend to publish their work in journals (Kim et al, 2020;Malički et al, 2021;Vale, 2015).…”