The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings

Abstract

Heavy vehicle-train collisions have the potential to be catastrophic in terms of fatalities, environmental disaster, delays in the rail network, and extensive damage to property. Heavy vehicles, such as 'Road Trains' and 'B-Doubles', are vulnerable road users due to their size and mass and require specific risk management solutions. The present study aimed to capture the experiences of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers at road-rail level crossings, with a view to exploring the contributing factors toward such accidents. A series of semi-structured focus groups was conducted, with a total of 17 train drivers and 26 heavy vehicle drivers taking part. Though there were some differences between the groups in perceptions of the causes of heavy vehicle-level crossing incidents, discussion in both groups centred on design issues an behavioural issues. With regard to design, the configuration of level crossings was found to affect heavy vehicle driver visibility and effective vehicle clearance. With regard to behaviour, discussion centred around wilful violation of crossing protocols, often as a time-saving measure, as well as driver complacency due to high levels of familiarity. The implications of these factors for future level crossing safety initiatives are discussed.

Mistakes or deliberate violations? A study into the origins of rule breaking at pedestrian train crossings

“…It has yet to be confirmed whether pedestrians make calculated risks, although it has been hypothesised that some weigh the perceived safety of a route against the time and effort that would be required to use it (Lobb, 2006). Additionally, researchers have suggested that risky crossing behaviour may be reinforced if individuals consistently engage in such behaviour and avoid the negative consequences (Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Rail Innovation, 2010; Davey et al, 2008). This phenomenon is otherwise known as "punishment avoidance."…”

Application of Automatic Level Crossing Technology in Indonesia

“…Dengan kondisi lalu lintas yang semrawut, pengguna jalan menjadi tidak sabar, khususnya saat mereka terhalang pintu LC saat harus menunggu KA yang lewat dalam waktu yang tidak menentu (Leibowitz, 1985). Dan, pengguna jalan yang tidak sabar dan ceroboh cenderung meningkatkan kecepatan kendaraannya untuk mendahului KA melintas pada LC tersebut (Davey et al, 2008). Ketika pengguna jalan mendekat kearah LC, probabilitas kegagalan pengguna jalan dalam mengurangi kecepatan kendaraan sebesar 0.308 sedangkan probabilitas kegagalan pengguna jalan dalam memperhatikan rambu-rambu dan sinyal adalah 0.046 (Findiastuti, Wignjosoebroto dan Dewi, 2010).…”

A risk assessment study on accidents at French level crossings using Bayesian belief networks

“…According to the investigation of the Office of the Chief Investigator (OCI), the truck driver in this study was not aware of the train and the activated state of the LX until it was too late to stop. A study conducted by Davey et al (2008) discussed the intentional violation of vehicle drivers crossing LXs, particularly focusing on vehicle driver complacency due to the high level of familiarity. Tey et al (2011) conducted an experiment to measure vehicle driver response to LXs equipped with stop signs (passive), flashing lights and half barriers with flashing lights (active) respectively.…”