2020
DOI: 10.24287/1726-1708-2020-19-1-47-52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of using the Brentuximab vedotin in the treatment of children and young adults with primary refractory course and relapses of Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract: In many international studies, brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been shown to be highly effective in adult patients with primary refractory forms or recurrent Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The group of children and adolescents received BV is not sufficient yet to assess the effectiveness and toxicity as in adults. In multicenter randomized trials BV was shown to be highly effective in adult patients. Aims: to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of anti-relapse therapy with BV followed by hematopoietic stem cell tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Auto-HSCT is a standard treatment for remission consolidation in pediatric r/r HL after second line chemotherapy [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Auto-HSCT is a standard treatment for remission consolidation in pediatric r/r HL after second line chemotherapy [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICIs were combined with bendamustine 90 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 2 (n=5) of 21-day cycle, gemcitabine 1000 mg on days 1 and 8 (n=2) of 21-day cycle and brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg (n=2) on day 1 of 21-day cycle. Median number of ICIs infusions was 5 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) and median number of combinational therapy cycles was 3 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). The response before auto-HSCT was evaluated by PET-CT using the Lugano criteria: complete remission (n=6, 38%), partial response (n=9, 56%), progression (n=1, 6%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%