2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any event, we submit that the properties of the text materials used in empirical studies on mind-wandering promise to have a direct impact on the quantitative and qualitative properties of mind-wandering episodes. This is consistent with the recent empirical finding that the properties of literary texts have an important impact on the reading experience (Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018). For this reason, we suggest that future research should develop selection criteria for text material to increase the explanatory value of the interpretation of empirical data.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlooksupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any event, we submit that the properties of the text materials used in empirical studies on mind-wandering promise to have a direct impact on the quantitative and qualitative properties of mind-wandering episodes. This is consistent with the recent empirical finding that the properties of literary texts have an important impact on the reading experience (Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018). For this reason, we suggest that future research should develop selection criteria for text material to increase the explanatory value of the interpretation of empirical data.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlooksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The last two questions are targeted at the participants, whose habits and skill levels should be carefully detected by using standard print exposure measures (Stanovich and West, 1989; Moore and Gordon, 2015). Furthermore, recent empirical evidence suggests that there are inter-individual differences in the reported reading experiences (Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018). This might also have implications for the future empirical exploration of the links between mind-wandering and reading.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the temporal sampling of syllabic speech-sounds hypothesized in the auditory TSF, visual processing of text requires the rapid serial sampling of text. This occurs via sequential fixations that enable effective coordination of the cognitive visual process required to read, e.g., visual attention, feature binding and spatial coding ( Cornelissen and Hansen, 1998 ; Rayner, 1998 ; Vidyasagar, 1999 , 2013 ; Vidyasagar and Pammer, 1999 , 2010 ; Pammer et al, 2004a , b ; Facoetti et al, 2006 , 2010 ; Sireteanu et al, 2008 ; Pammer, 2014 ; Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018 ). Given that text is a static stimulus, temporal coding occurs via rapid processing of visual information that is gathered during saccades and fixations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires effective oculomotor control and rapid higher-order visual processing, both of which are disrupted in dyslexia. Dyslexic readers have difficulties conducting visual search and orienting attention among cluttered environments, ( Vidyasagar and Pammer, 1999 , 2010 ; Facoetti et al, 2006 , 2010 ; Sireteanu et al, 2008 ; Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018 ), processing low spatial frequency arrays ( Badcock and Lovegrove, 1981 ; Slaghuis and Ryan, 1999 ), feature binding ( Pammer et al, 2004a ), coding the temporal sequences of words and letters within words ( Stein, 1991 ; Cornelissen and Hansen, 1998 ; Vidyasagar, 1999 , 2004 ; Vidyasagar and Pammer, 1999 ; Facoetti et al, 2006 ), and convergence of images from left and right eyes ( Jainta and Kapoula, 2011 ).…”
Section: Cognitive Deficits In Developmental Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the multisensory aspects of handling books mainly has to do with perception, the multisensory aspects of reading are concerned mostly with the rich mental imagery that is evoked by the written word. The multiple sensory aspects of mental imagery that may be at work during reading include the auditory 'inner voice' during silent reading (e.g., Moore and Schwitzgebel, 2018;Perrone-Bertolotti et al, 2012), and the complementary 'inner ear' imagining any non-speech sounds that may be evoked in a passage (e.g., Brunyé et al, 2010). There is even some evidence that readers may give different characters given different voices too (Alexander and Nygaard, 2008;Kurby et al, 2009).…”
Section: Multisensory Mental Imagery Evoked By Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%