2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05474-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of pregnant women in contexts of vulnerability of prenatal primary nursing care: a descriptive interpretative qualitative study

Abstract: Background Prenatal primary nursing care contributes to improving the health outcomes of mothers and unborn babies. Some pregnant women in contexts of vulnerability experience prenatal nursing care in a positive way, while some do not. A better understanding of factors influencing this experience could help improve prenatal nursing care. The aim of this study was to describe factors influencing the prenatal primary nursing care experience of pregnant women in contexts of vulnerability. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, the same two researchers discussed and cross-checked the identi ed analytical and contextual concepts and sought to obtain a detailed understanding of the data [50]. This constant comparison process through inductive and interpretative reasoning allowed a withincase and across-case analysis to compare new concepts with earlier coded data so that similarities and differences in data could be identi ed and analysed [51][52][53]. Subsequently, the concepts were linked to relevant focus group fragments by using the QSR NVivo 12 software program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, the same two researchers discussed and cross-checked the identi ed analytical and contextual concepts and sought to obtain a detailed understanding of the data [50]. This constant comparison process through inductive and interpretative reasoning allowed a withincase and across-case analysis to compare new concepts with earlier coded data so that similarities and differences in data could be identi ed and analysed [51][52][53]. Subsequently, the concepts were linked to relevant focus group fragments by using the QSR NVivo 12 software program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, the same two researchers discussed and cross-checked the identified analytical and contextual concepts and sought to obtain a detailed understanding of the data [ 50 ]. This constant comparison process through inductive and interpretative reasoning allowed a within-case and across-case analysis to compare new concepts with earlier coded data so that similarities and differences in data could be identified and analysed [ 51 – 53 ]. Subsequently, the concepts were linked to relevant focus group fragments by using the QSR NVivo 12 software program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%